Sean Kent

Yes. I mean, I don't know the terms of the settlement. Let's make this clear. I have not read the terms of the settlement. There may be a confidentiality requirement on her settlement that prevents her from testifying civilly, but there's nothing to stop her from testifying criminally.

Yes. I mean, I don't know the terms of the settlement. Let's make this clear. I have not read the terms of the settlement. There may be a confidentiality requirement on her settlement that prevents her from testifying civilly, but there's nothing to stop her from testifying criminally.

Yes. I mean, I don't know the terms of the settlement. Let's make this clear. I have not read the terms of the settlement. There may be a confidentiality requirement on her settlement that prevents her from testifying civilly, but there's nothing to stop her from testifying criminally.

Vets don't give a damn about no NDA. They're like, that's wonderful. You signed that. Great. Get on the stand and testify. Now. They don't care. That NDA does nothing for the criminal participation. Nothing.

Vets don't give a damn about no NDA. They're like, that's wonderful. You signed that. Great. Get on the stand and testify. Now. They don't care. That NDA does nothing for the criminal participation. Nothing.

Vets don't give a damn about no NDA. They're like, that's wonderful. You signed that. Great. Get on the stand and testify. Now. They don't care. That NDA does nothing for the criminal participation. Nothing.

LeBron! LeBron! We know you was at them Diddy parties! We know you was there! We know you was at them Diddy parties!

LeBron! LeBron! We know you was at them Diddy parties! We know you was there! We know you was at them Diddy parties!

LeBron! LeBron! We know you was at them Diddy parties! We know you was there! We know you was at them Diddy parties!

And I just want to quote to you Mr. Combs' response. He still professes his wider innocence when it comes to Cassie Ventura. And when it comes to your client, his lawyer said, Mr. Combs is shocked and disappointed by this lawsuit. It's an attempt to rewrite history.

And I just want to quote to you Mr. Combs' response. He still professes his wider innocence when it comes to Cassie Ventura. And when it comes to your client, his lawyer said, Mr. Combs is shocked and disappointed by this lawsuit. It's an attempt to rewrite history.

And I just want to quote to you Mr. Combs' response. He still professes his wider innocence when it comes to Cassie Ventura. And when it comes to your client, his lawyer said, Mr. Combs is shocked and disappointed by this lawsuit. It's an attempt to rewrite history.

Dawn Rashad has now manufactured a series of false claims, all in the hopes of trying to get a payday, conveniently timed to coincide with her album release and press tour. If Ms. Rashad had such a negative experience with Mr. Combs, as she said over the period, She would not have chosen to continue directly working with him, nor returned for an album reboot in 2020. That's his perspective.

Dawn Rashad has now manufactured a series of false claims, all in the hopes of trying to get a payday, conveniently timed to coincide with her album release and press tour. If Ms. Rashad had such a negative experience with Mr. Combs, as she said over the period, She would not have chosen to continue directly working with him, nor returned for an album reboot in 2020. That's his perspective.

Dawn Rashad has now manufactured a series of false claims, all in the hopes of trying to get a payday, conveniently timed to coincide with her album release and press tour. If Ms. Rashad had such a negative experience with Mr. Combs, as she said over the period, She would not have chosen to continue directly working with him, nor returned for an album reboot in 2020. That's his perspective.

Just to explain, from your perspective, she did continue to work with him. She worked with him from 2004 to 2020. In the indictment, you've described an atmosphere of fear. What did you mean by that?

Just to explain, from your perspective, she did continue to work with him. She worked with him from 2004 to 2020. In the indictment, you've described an atmosphere of fear. What did you mean by that?

Just to explain, from your perspective, she did continue to work with him. She worked with him from 2004 to 2020. In the indictment, you've described an atmosphere of fear. What did you mean by that?

Here's my first thought when I heard it. You always have to ask, are we just bringing a lawsuit because he's an awful human being? Or can we prove that we actually have damages? Do we have... And you have to prove it. Let's make sure. You have to have cognizable damage. You just can't say, this was awful. Give me money. You have to, under our system of justice, show what your actual damages are.

Here's my first thought when I heard it. You always have to ask, are we just bringing a lawsuit because he's an awful human being? Or can we prove that we actually have damages? Do we have... And you have to prove it. Let's make sure. You have to have cognizable damage. You just can't say, this was awful. Give me money. You have to, under our system of justice, show what your actual damages are.