Senator Ted Cruz

backing, which if he means more hundreds of billions of dollars, the answer is no thank you. But he continues, quote, Through my discussions over recent days, we've agreed that the U.K., France, and others will work with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting, Starmer said at a press conference on Sunday. Then we'll discuss that plan with the United States and take it forward together.

backing, which if he means more hundreds of billions of dollars, the answer is no thank you. But he continues, quote, Through my discussions over recent days, we've agreed that the U.K., France, and others will work with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting, Starmer said at a press conference on Sunday. Then we'll discuss that plan with the United States and take it forward together.

Now, it's interesting. To do so, Starmer vowed the United Kingdom would ramp up its support for Ukraine. That included a loan of, what do you think? A lot of money, right? What do you think? Pick a number. Okay.

Now, it's interesting. To do so, Starmer vowed the United Kingdom would ramp up its support for Ukraine. That included a loan of, what do you think? A lot of money, right? What do you think? Pick a number. Okay.

Now, it's interesting. To do so, Starmer vowed the United Kingdom would ramp up its support for Ukraine. That included a loan of, what do you think? A lot of money, right? What do you think? Pick a number. Okay.

So higher than that. So you're even more pessimistic. Okay. That includes a loan of 2.26 billion British pounds, which is $2.84 billion. So look, $2.84 billion, that's real money, except for the fact that the United States has spent about $175 billion on Ukraine. That's part of the fundamental imbalance there.

So higher than that. So you're even more pessimistic. Okay. That includes a loan of 2.26 billion British pounds, which is $2.84 billion. So look, $2.84 billion, that's real money, except for the fact that the United States has spent about $175 billion on Ukraine. That's part of the fundamental imbalance there.

So higher than that. So you're even more pessimistic. Okay. That includes a loan of 2.26 billion British pounds, which is $2.84 billion. So look, $2.84 billion, that's real money, except for the fact that the United States has spent about $175 billion on Ukraine. That's part of the fundamental imbalance there.

Yeah, look, I'm all for the Europeans stepping in and doing everything they can. If they want to do that, knock yourself out. They're welcome to spend their money. But we're not the welfare provider for the world. And to be clear, why are we borrowing when we've got $36 trillion in debt? Why are we borrowing money from China to give it to other countries? That makes no sense.

Yeah, look, I'm all for the Europeans stepping in and doing everything they can. If they want to do that, knock yourself out. They're welcome to spend their money. But we're not the welfare provider for the world. And to be clear, why are we borrowing when we've got $36 trillion in debt? Why are we borrowing money from China to give it to other countries? That makes no sense.

Yeah, look, I'm all for the Europeans stepping in and doing everything they can. If they want to do that, knock yourself out. They're welcome to spend their money. But we're not the welfare provider for the world. And to be clear, why are we borrowing when we've got $36 trillion in debt? Why are we borrowing money from China to give it to other countries? That makes no sense.

And it is an interesting shift. Now, look, I will say one of the frustrating things about this meeting last week in the Oval is the meeting was there to sign an agreement, an agreement that had been negotiated ahead of time. And that agreement was an agreement where Ukraine would give the United States a substantial interest in its rare earth minerals and valuable resources to pay back Ukraine.

And it is an interesting shift. Now, look, I will say one of the frustrating things about this meeting last week in the Oval is the meeting was there to sign an agreement, an agreement that had been negotiated ahead of time. And that agreement was an agreement where Ukraine would give the United States a substantial interest in its rare earth minerals and valuable resources to pay back Ukraine.

And it is an interesting shift. Now, look, I will say one of the frustrating things about this meeting last week in the Oval is the meeting was there to sign an agreement, an agreement that had been negotiated ahead of time. And that agreement was an agreement where Ukraine would give the United States a substantial interest in its rare earth minerals and valuable resources to pay back Ukraine.

the $175 billion we've given them. That agreement made a lot of sense. That agreement was pre-negotiated. I think the White House thought Zelensky was going to show up, sign the agreement, and leave. He didn't. Instead, he put on this performance. And I actually want you to listen—

the $175 billion we've given them. That agreement made a lot of sense. That agreement was pre-negotiated. I think the White House thought Zelensky was going to show up, sign the agreement, and leave. He didn't. Instead, he put on this performance. And I actually want you to listen—

the $175 billion we've given them. That agreement made a lot of sense. That agreement was pre-negotiated. I think the White House thought Zelensky was going to show up, sign the agreement, and leave. He didn't. Instead, he put on this performance. And I actually want you to listen—

To this exchange on CNN, because it's a striking exchange, the first speaker is Scott Jennings, who, by the way, Scott Jennings is doing a phenomenal job on CNN being a voice of reason and common sense, fighting against a bunch of numbnuts and left-wing commies. he's really doing an effective job. And he's, in this case, talking with Josh Rogin.

To this exchange on CNN, because it's a striking exchange, the first speaker is Scott Jennings, who, by the way, Scott Jennings is doing a phenomenal job on CNN being a voice of reason and common sense, fighting against a bunch of numbnuts and left-wing commies. he's really doing an effective job. And he's, in this case, talking with Josh Rogin.

To this exchange on CNN, because it's a striking exchange, the first speaker is Scott Jennings, who, by the way, Scott Jennings is doing a phenomenal job on CNN being a voice of reason and common sense, fighting against a bunch of numbnuts and left-wing commies. he's really doing an effective job. And he's, in this case, talking with Josh Rogin.