Serhii Plokhy

And that was the most difficult times and days. And speaking about Zelensky, every, I understand, reasonable leader in the West was trying to convince him to leave Ukraine and to set a government in exile in Poland or in London. And it was reasonable to accept one of his predecessors, Mr. Yanukovych, flat gave.

And that was the most difficult times and days. And speaking about Zelensky, every, I understand, reasonable leader in the West was trying to convince him to leave Ukraine and to set a government in exile in Poland or in London. And it was reasonable to accept one of his predecessors, Mr. Yanukovych, flat gave.

And that was the most difficult times and days. And speaking about Zelensky, every, I understand, reasonable leader in the West was trying to convince him to leave Ukraine and to set a government in exile in Poland or in London. And it was reasonable to accept one of his predecessors, Mr. Yanukovych, flat gave.

A few months before that, in Afghanistan, the president of Afghanistan fled Afghanistan. That was a reasonable thing to expect. And he turned out to be very unreasonable in that sense. That comes with the guts, his guts and guts people around him and Ukrainians in general.

A few months before that, in Afghanistan, the president of Afghanistan fled Afghanistan. That was a reasonable thing to expect. And he turned out to be very unreasonable in that sense. That comes with the guts, his guts and guts people around him and Ukrainians in general.

A few months before that, in Afghanistan, the president of Afghanistan fled Afghanistan. That was a reasonable thing to expect. And he turned out to be very unreasonable in that sense. That comes with the guts, his guts and guts people around him and Ukrainians in general.

Because I think he believes in things. And one of those things was that if he is president and he is in the presidential office, he is there to play his role to the end. And another thing, my personal, again, I never met Volodymyr Zelensky. My personal understanding of him is that he has talent that helped him in his career before the presidency and then helps now.

Because I think he believes in things. And one of those things was that if he is president and he is in the presidential office, he is there to play his role to the end. And another thing, my personal, again, I never met Volodymyr Zelensky. My personal understanding of him is that he has talent that helped him in his career before the presidency and then helps now.

Because I think he believes in things. And one of those things was that if he is president and he is in the presidential office, he is there to play his role to the end. And another thing, my personal, again, I never met Volodymyr Zelensky. My personal understanding of him is that he has talent that helped him in his career before the presidency and then helps now.

He fills the audience and then channels the attitude of the audience and amplifies it. And I think that another reason why he didn't leave Kyiv was that he failed the audience. The audience in that particular context were the Ukrainians.

He fills the audience and then channels the attitude of the audience and amplifies it. And I think that another reason why he didn't leave Kyiv was that he failed the audience. The audience in that particular context were the Ukrainians.

He fills the audience and then channels the attitude of the audience and amplifies it. And I think that another reason why he didn't leave Kyiv was that he failed the audience. The audience in that particular context were the Ukrainians.

The East and the West was not already such an issue after Crimea and part of Donbass being gone. So Ukraine was much more united than it was before. He brought to power his before that really non-existent party of regents,

The East and the West was not already such an issue after Crimea and part of Donbass being gone. So Ukraine was much more united than it was before. He brought to power his before that really non-existent party of regents,

The East and the West was not already such an issue after Crimea and part of Donbass being gone. So Ukraine was much more united than it was before. He brought to power his before that really non-existent party of regents,

on his personal popularity, but the important thing is that he created a majority in the parliament, which really reflected the unity that existed among Ukrainians that was not there before. He won with 73% of the population, of those who took part in the elections. His predecessor, Petro Poroshenko, also carried 90% of the precincts. The same happened with Zelensky.

on his personal popularity, but the important thing is that he created a majority in the parliament, which really reflected the unity that existed among Ukrainians that was not there before. He won with 73% of the population, of those who took part in the elections. His predecessor, Petro Poroshenko, also carried 90% of the precincts. The same happened with Zelensky.

on his personal popularity, but the important thing is that he created a majority in the parliament, which really reflected the unity that existed among Ukrainians that was not there before. He won with 73% of the population, of those who took part in the elections. His predecessor, Petro Poroshenko, also carried 90% of the precincts. The same happened with Zelensky.

The country unified after 2014 to a degree it was impossible to imagine before, and Zelensky felt that. Zelensky knew that. And that's where the talent of politician really matters. That's something that you can see beyond just data, and you can feel that. Apparently, Yeltsin had that ability.

The country unified after 2014 to a degree it was impossible to imagine before, and Zelensky felt that. Zelensky knew that. And that's where the talent of politician really matters. That's something that you can see beyond just data, and you can feel that. Apparently, Yeltsin had that ability.