Serhii Plokhy

Chernobyl was taken over by the Russian Army, or National Guard rather, on the first day of the invasion. Then there was Zaporizhzhia, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. where the battle was waged on the territory of the nuclear power plant, the missiles being fired, buildings catching fire. The situation that brought the Fukushima disaster was there in Zaporizhia more than once.

Chernobyl was taken over by the Russian Army, or National Guard rather, on the first day of the invasion. Then there was Zaporizhzhia, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. where the battle was waged on the territory of the nuclear power plant, the missiles being fired, buildings catching fire. The situation that brought the Fukushima disaster was there in Zaporizhia more than once.

Chernobyl was taken over by the Russian Army, or National Guard rather, on the first day of the invasion. Then there was Zaporizhzhia, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. where the battle was waged on the territory of the nuclear power plant, the missiles being fired, buildings catching fire. The situation that brought the Fukushima disaster was there in Zaporizhia more than once.

Fukushima came because the reactors were shut down, as they are in Zaporizhia, but they still needed electricity. to bring water and to cool them down. In Fukushima case, it was the tsunami that cut off the supply of electricity. In the case of Zaporizhia, there was the warfare that was happening in the area around Zaporizhia that did the same effect.

Fukushima came because the reactors were shut down, as they are in Zaporizhia, but they still needed electricity. to bring water and to cool them down. In Fukushima case, it was the tsunami that cut off the supply of electricity. In the case of Zaporizhia, there was the warfare that was happening in the area around Zaporizhia that did the same effect.

Fukushima came because the reactors were shut down, as they are in Zaporizhia, but they still needed electricity. to bring water and to cool them down. In Fukushima case, it was the tsunami that cut off the supply of electricity. In the case of Zaporizhia, there was the warfare that was happening in the area around Zaporizhia that did the same effect.

We have 440 reactors in the world today, plus minus. None of them was designed to withstand the direct missile attack or to function in the conditions of the warfare. If operators, they're human, they make mistakes like they did at Three Mile Island or Chernobyl, but think also if the war is happening around them, if they're not sure what is happening with their families.

We have 440 reactors in the world today, plus minus. None of them was designed to withstand the direct missile attack or to function in the conditions of the warfare. If operators, they're human, they make mistakes like they did at Three Mile Island or Chernobyl, but think also if the war is happening around them, if they're not sure what is happening with their families.

We have 440 reactors in the world today, plus minus. None of them was designed to withstand the direct missile attack or to function in the conditions of the warfare. If operators, they're human, they make mistakes like they did at Three Mile Island or Chernobyl, but think also if the war is happening around them, if they're not sure what is happening with their families.

If they don't know whether they will be next missile, whether they will hit the control room or not, that multiplies also. We are in a situation where we are not done yet with the nuclear accidents. It's not like we don't pay attention or we don't learn. Smart people work on that. And after every accident, try to figure the way how not to step into the same trap.

If they don't know whether they will be next missile, whether they will hit the control room or not, that multiplies also. We are in a situation where we are not done yet with the nuclear accidents. It's not like we don't pay attention or we don't learn. Smart people work on that. And after every accident, try to figure the way how not to step into the same trap.

If they don't know whether they will be next missile, whether they will hit the control room or not, that multiplies also. We are in a situation where we are not done yet with the nuclear accidents. It's not like we don't pay attention or we don't learn. Smart people work on that. And after every accident, try to figure the way how not to step into the same trap.

But next accident would actually expose a new vulnerability. You deal with Chernobyl and then tsunami comes. You deal with tsunami and then war comes. And we really... In that sense, we have sometimes wild imagination, but sometimes it's difficult to imagine what can happen next. We are not done. There will be nuclear accidents, unfortunately, in the future.

But next accident would actually expose a new vulnerability. You deal with Chernobyl and then tsunami comes. You deal with tsunami and then war comes. And we really... In that sense, we have sometimes wild imagination, but sometimes it's difficult to imagine what can happen next. We are not done. There will be nuclear accidents, unfortunately, in the future.

But next accident would actually expose a new vulnerability. You deal with Chernobyl and then tsunami comes. You deal with tsunami and then war comes. And we really... In that sense, we have sometimes wild imagination, but sometimes it's difficult to imagine what can happen next. We are not done. There will be nuclear accidents, unfortunately, in the future.

That makes nuclear energy so problematic when you count on it to fight climate change. I'll explain why. You gave the figures how many people die from burning coal, from how many people die from radiation. And it's a good argument.

That makes nuclear energy so problematic when you count on it to fight climate change. I'll explain why. You gave the figures how many people die from burning coal, from how many people die from radiation. And it's a good argument.

That makes nuclear energy so problematic when you count on it to fight climate change. I'll explain why. You gave the figures how many people die from burning coal, from how many people die from radiation. And it's a good argument.

Some people would question them because it's also the issue of not just dying, but impact of radiation on cancer, on our health, which is not completely understood yet. So still there is a lot of question marks. But let's assume what you are saying. That's the figures. That's how it is. But we as people, we, for whatever reason, are not afraid of coal. But we are very much afraid of radiation.

Some people would question them because it's also the issue of not just dying, but impact of radiation on cancer, on our health, which is not completely understood yet. So still there is a lot of question marks. But let's assume what you are saying. That's the figures. That's how it is. But we as people, we, for whatever reason, are not afraid of coal. But we are very much afraid of radiation.