Sharon McMahon

They intentionally restrain the power of the president significantly on purpose because the framers of the Constitution were all coming from monarchies where the governments were saying, here's the religion you have to belong to. The idea that whatever I say, whatever whim that's at the top of my head, we're just going to go with that thing.

They intentionally restrain the power of the president significantly on purpose because the framers of the Constitution were all coming from monarchies where the governments were saying, here's the religion you have to belong to. The idea that whatever I say, whatever whim that's at the top of my head, we're just going to go with that thing.

They intentionally created a system that constrained the power of the president. This is one of my pet peeves when a president is like, I've created 82 million jobs.

They intentionally created a system that constrained the power of the president. This is one of my pet peeves when a president is like, I've created 82 million jobs.

They intentionally created a system that constrained the power of the president. This is one of my pet peeves when a president is like, I've created 82 million jobs.

You sure did not.

You sure did not.

You sure did not.

Yes, you might have some ideas that can help promote job growth. Maybe you have some ideas. And you can call up some of the people in Congress and be like, listen, we should pass the CHIPS Act. We should start getting more microchips made in the United States. We should start passing some tax incentives so that people bring manufacturing back to the United States. Yes, you can do things like that.

Yes, you might have some ideas that can help promote job growth. Maybe you have some ideas. And you can call up some of the people in Congress and be like, listen, we should pass the CHIPS Act. We should start getting more microchips made in the United States. We should start passing some tax incentives so that people bring manufacturing back to the United States. Yes, you can do things like that.

Yes, you might have some ideas that can help promote job growth. Maybe you have some ideas. And you can call up some of the people in Congress and be like, listen, we should pass the CHIPS Act. We should start getting more microchips made in the United States. We should start passing some tax incentives so that people bring manufacturing back to the United States. Yes, you can do things like that.

But the idea that you get like, oh, attaboy, pat on the back, you made all those jobs. That's really annoying to me. Also, the same is true of the economy. The president gets a lot of blame or a lot of credit for how the economy overall is doing.

But the idea that you get like, oh, attaboy, pat on the back, you made all those jobs. That's really annoying to me. Also, the same is true of the economy. The president gets a lot of blame or a lot of credit for how the economy overall is doing.

But the idea that you get like, oh, attaboy, pat on the back, you made all those jobs. That's really annoying to me. Also, the same is true of the economy. The president gets a lot of blame or a lot of credit for how the economy overall is doing.

When the economy is so multifactorial and so complicated, the factors that go into creating low unemployment reach so far beyond what a president has the power to do with his little pen.

When the economy is so multifactorial and so complicated, the factors that go into creating low unemployment reach so far beyond what a president has the power to do with his little pen.

When the economy is so multifactorial and so complicated, the factors that go into creating low unemployment reach so far beyond what a president has the power to do with his little pen.

Pull it down and move it to the low position. We want low unemployment.

Pull it down and move it to the low position. We want low unemployment.

Pull it down and move it to the low position. We want low unemployment.