Shaun Kent

I think he tried to file suit against Diddy, if I read correctly, at least two different times for the same action. They were both thrown out based upon it was outside the statute of limitations. I think the same thing is going to happen on this situation because I don't do good math, but that's well outside the six-year window in which this case is being brought.

And so they're being creative and trying to bring it outside the statute now.

And so they're being creative and trying to bring it outside the statute now.

And so they're being creative and trying to bring it outside the statute now.

That's why they're getting creative. We don't want someone to bring a lawsuit 10 and 20 years outside the scope. The biggest reason is people die, memories are fallible, evidence is lost. And so we want lawsuits to be brought as close or contemporaneous to the action as humanly possible. But the standard that they're relying upon is the new or should have known standard.

That's why they're getting creative. We don't want someone to bring a lawsuit 10 and 20 years outside the scope. The biggest reason is people die, memories are fallible, evidence is lost. And so we want lawsuits to be brought as close or contemporaneous to the action as humanly possible. But the standard that they're relying upon is the new or should have known standard.

That's why they're getting creative. We don't want someone to bring a lawsuit 10 and 20 years outside the scope. The biggest reason is people die, memories are fallible, evidence is lost. And so we want lawsuits to be brought as close or contemporaneous to the action as humanly possible. But the standard that they're relying upon is the new or should have known standard.

And so what they're saying is we would not have known about this lawsuit until now. So the statute of limitations could not have run. The problem that they're missing is what I just said, new or should have known. So I guarantee the response will be through due diligence and a tad bit of investigation.

And so what they're saying is we would not have known about this lawsuit until now. So the statute of limitations could not have run. The problem that they're missing is what I just said, new or should have known. So I guarantee the response will be through due diligence and a tad bit of investigation.

And so what they're saying is we would not have known about this lawsuit until now. So the statute of limitations could not have run. The problem that they're missing is what I just said, new or should have known. So I guarantee the response will be through due diligence and a tad bit of investigation.

They should have been able to find out way back in the day that his mom possibly had something to do with it. When we bring lawsuits in any time, and this is a great lesson, Anytime you've read a lawsuit, if you've noticed that there's like 60 people listed, you're like, why are they listing all of these people in the lawsuits? This is exactly why.

They should have been able to find out way back in the day that his mom possibly had something to do with it. When we bring lawsuits in any time, and this is a great lesson, Anytime you've read a lawsuit, if you've noticed that there's like 60 people listed, you're like, why are they listing all of these people in the lawsuits? This is exactly why.

They should have been able to find out way back in the day that his mom possibly had something to do with it. When we bring lawsuits in any time, and this is a great lesson, Anytime you've read a lawsuit, if you've noticed that there's like 60 people listed, you're like, why are they listing all of these people in the lawsuits? This is exactly why.

So we don't run the risk of missing somebody and then later having to bring a lawsuit 10 days down the road.

So we don't run the risk of missing somebody and then later having to bring a lawsuit 10 days down the road.

So we don't run the risk of missing somebody and then later having to bring a lawsuit 10 days down the road.

You've got corroboration, you've got corroboration of conduct. A lot of these lawsuits, I think, well, there's no doubt we're going to stop seeing these lawsuits. The filings are officially stopped. The Gender Motivated Violence Act had a timeline on it, which hit, I think, Sean, correct me if I'm wrong, February 28th. And so that's why you saw these last filings come through.

You've got corroboration, you've got corroboration of conduct. A lot of these lawsuits, I think, well, there's no doubt we're going to stop seeing these lawsuits. The filings are officially stopped. The Gender Motivated Violence Act had a timeline on it, which hit, I think, Sean, correct me if I'm wrong, February 28th. And so that's why you saw these last filings come through.

You've got corroboration, you've got corroboration of conduct. A lot of these lawsuits, I think, well, there's no doubt we're going to stop seeing these lawsuits. The filings are officially stopped. The Gender Motivated Violence Act had a timeline on it, which hit, I think, Sean, correct me if I'm wrong, February 28th. And so that's why you saw these last filings come through.

So they're officially done. But yeah, you have her words, you have corroboration. I don't want to call it a valid lawsuit, but you have an appropriate filed lawsuit from the victim's point of view. The problem is, if you watch... I don't want to say the wrong way, but the social media push. And I think I talked about this the first time we ever got on here.