Shumita Basu

If this family leaves, the kids who are U.S. citizens can come back in the future under current U.S. laws, but the possibility of the parents ever returning is far from clear. Now to an ongoing trial involving Google.

The Department of Justice argued in court yesterday that in order to break Google's monopoly on the Internet search market, the Silicon Valley giant should be forced to sell off its Chrome web browser and change other key parts of its business. The DOJ argued for years that Google is a monopoly in online search. And last summer, a judge agreed, ruling that it's illegal.

The Department of Justice argued in court yesterday that in order to break Google's monopoly on the Internet search market, the Silicon Valley giant should be forced to sell off its Chrome web browser and change other key parts of its business. The DOJ argued for years that Google is a monopoly in online search. And last summer, a judge agreed, ruling that it's illegal.

The Department of Justice argued in court yesterday that in order to break Google's monopoly on the Internet search market, the Silicon Valley giant should be forced to sell off its Chrome web browser and change other key parts of its business. The DOJ argued for years that Google is a monopoly in online search. And last summer, a judge agreed, ruling that it's illegal.

Today was the first day in a three-week trial to decide how Google should remedy that and open up competition. This is the second such ruling against Google in the past year. Last week, a judge also ruled Google illegally monopolized certain ad tech markets.

Today was the first day in a three-week trial to decide how Google should remedy that and open up competition. This is the second such ruling against Google in the past year. Last week, a judge also ruled Google illegally monopolized certain ad tech markets.

Today was the first day in a three-week trial to decide how Google should remedy that and open up competition. This is the second such ruling against Google in the past year. Last week, a judge also ruled Google illegally monopolized certain ad tech markets.

In that case, the DOJ argued Google maintained dominance with a three-pronged digital ad business that includes technology advertisers use to get their ads in front of people, exchanges to determine which ads people are served, and the platform publishers use to sell ad space on their web pages.

In that case, the DOJ argued Google maintained dominance with a three-pronged digital ad business that includes technology advertisers use to get their ads in front of people, exchanges to determine which ads people are served, and the platform publishers use to sell ad space on their web pages.

In that case, the DOJ argued Google maintained dominance with a three-pronged digital ad business that includes technology advertisers use to get their ads in front of people, exchanges to determine which ads people are served, and the platform publishers use to sell ad space on their web pages.

Josh Sisko is a reporter for Bloomberg who covers tech and antitrust litigation. He says much of the government's argument centered around previous acquisitions of companies that are key parts of the online advertising ecosystem.

Josh Sisko is a reporter for Bloomberg who covers tech and antitrust litigation. He says much of the government's argument centered around previous acquisitions of companies that are key parts of the online advertising ecosystem.

Josh Sisko is a reporter for Bloomberg who covers tech and antitrust litigation. He says much of the government's argument centered around previous acquisitions of companies that are key parts of the online advertising ecosystem.

And the DOJ has argued if Google weren't allowed to act this way, it would be better for advertisers.

And the DOJ has argued if Google weren't allowed to act this way, it would be better for advertisers.

And the DOJ has argued if Google weren't allowed to act this way, it would be better for advertisers.

Google says it disagrees with the decision and plans to appeal, saying in a statement, publishers have many options and they choose Google because our ad tech tools are simple, affordable and effective. All these court cases could lead to some big changes in how Google operates.

Google says it disagrees with the decision and plans to appeal, saying in a statement, publishers have many options and they choose Google because our ad tech tools are simple, affordable and effective. All these court cases could lead to some big changes in how Google operates.

Google says it disagrees with the decision and plans to appeal, saying in a statement, publishers have many options and they choose Google because our ad tech tools are simple, affordable and effective. All these court cases could lead to some big changes in how Google operates.

In addition to potentially being ordered to sell Chrome, which is the world's leading web browser, Google could be told to sell its Android operating system, which is used by more smartphone users than any other OS. And perhaps most importantly, the company could be forced to terminate agreements with other big tech players that make Google the default search engine on smartphones and web browsers.