Simon Hunter

The interesting thing about from a rest perspective is the Eagles play five games where they are at a rest disadvantage.

The commanders and the Cowboys only play one such game.

So that's where I think the league could try to do a little bit better job of balancing things out within divisions.

But it is what it is.

The interesting note that I'll say, you know, Chad just mentioned at the top when he teed it off to you, Simon, about it's the Eagles.

So should we really be concerned here?

Because it's the Eagles.

You know, they can overcome this type of thing.

Since 2015, when they've been when they've played with a rest disadvantage of at least three days, they are seven, 14 and one straight up an ATS recording a minus 36 percent ROI.

So three days or worse rest advantage.

They've been absolutely terrible even since 2020.

Right.

When they've made trips to the Super Bowl and won three.

3-5 straight up, 2-6-1 ATS.

That's a minus 52% ROI when they are playing with a rest disadvantage of at least three days.

That's the third worst mark of any team in the NFL over that span.

So they haven't exactly...

overachieved against difficult rest situations.

And the reason I look at ATS when I'm looking at rest is because that's taking into consideration the point spread, which is the great equalizer.

I'm looking at over or under performance versus market expectation.