Sizwe Dhlomo
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Cuban revolution. Yes. Well, Arab Spring somewhat, but regimes change. Yes.
Cuban revolution. Yes. Well, Arab Spring somewhat, but regimes change. Yes.
Not necessarily. Not necessarily. They can be peaceful. Like in 1994, South Africa had a revolution, but a peaceful revolution. More or less.
Not necessarily. Not necessarily. They can be peaceful. Like in 1994, South Africa had a revolution, but a peaceful revolution. More or less.
This is why it's so interesting because all of it actually just boils down to economics and living conditions. Everything you've just highlighted is not a problem if people are comfortable. Yeah, completely. If we're all comfortable, I love AI. Because who wants to work? Yes. Let AI work.
This is why it's so interesting because all of it actually just boils down to economics and living conditions. Everything you've just highlighted is not a problem if people are comfortable. Yeah, completely. If we're all comfortable, I love AI. Because who wants to work? Yes. Let AI work.
If we're all comfortable and you're telling me you're going to bring in some Indian guy, hey, by all means, buddy, do the thing there. I'll suggest you have my time. Yeah, that's true. The problem is now when we're starving, they'll be like, hey, man, these foreigners are taking our jobs. That's the problem. That is the problem.
If we're all comfortable and you're telling me you're going to bring in some Indian guy, hey, by all means, buddy, do the thing there. I'll suggest you have my time. Yeah, that's true. The problem is now when we're starving, they'll be like, hey, man, these foreigners are taking our jobs. That's the problem. That is the problem.
Whereas if we were comfortable, we'd be like, hey, buddy, hey, I've got something here for you. You want to do this? Because I don't want to do it. That's essentially the issue.
Whereas if we were comfortable, we'd be like, hey, buddy, hey, I've got something here for you. You want to do this? Because I don't want to do it. That's essentially the issue.
And it can never happen. Wait, you think it can't happen? Never. Prosperity for all. It can. No, it cannot. No, but it can. Let me tell you why it can't happen.
And it can never happen. Wait, you think it can't happen? Never. Prosperity for all. It can. No, it cannot. No, but it can. Let me tell you why it can't happen.
So, Anel is right. There will always be disagreements. What I'm saying is when things are okay, the disagreements are inconsequential. Yes.
So, Anel is right. There will always be disagreements. What I'm saying is when things are okay, the disagreements are inconsequential. Yes.
So, There can never be prosperity for all because in order for people to prosper, there needs to be productivity and the productivity needs to come from somewhere. Now, what happens is you do get certain instances where there are more resources than there are those that defeat the resources. What it means is the model seems like it's working for a lot longer, but it's really not.
So, There can never be prosperity for all because in order for people to prosper, there needs to be productivity and the productivity needs to come from somewhere. Now, what happens is you do get certain instances where there are more resources than there are those that defeat the resources. What it means is the model seems like it's working for a lot longer, but it's really not.
The model is always deteriorating. That's just the nature of the model. You could be living in the Garden of Eden, but the more you procreate, the more you're going to run out of fruit in that garden.
The model is always deteriorating. That's just the nature of the model. You could be living in the Garden of Eden, but the more you procreate, the more you're going to run out of fruit in that garden.
The issue is not scarcity. It's about the distribution of resources.
The issue is not scarcity. It's about the distribution of resources.