SPEAKER_02

And hopefully it doesn't get to that point.

But it is a profoundly reckless thing to do.

That might be easier.

You know, that's like a...

It's a talking point.

I don't even mean to downplay that.

It's an understandable point.

It's a nice idea.

I think the issue, like this is what I've always seen, like the issue with the kind of take money out of politics angle and why I think the better approach is to take politics out of money.

Like I think – and I'm not saying either is easy to do.

But the issue that you have – and I know that there's a lot of like people I really love really say that all the time.

They go like you got to take money out of politics.

And I would certainly support like if there was – I think Rand Paul had a proposal –

a few years ago where it was like, if you make any money from a government contract, you should not be allowed to work in that sector for 20 years after you made, there's something like you shouldn't be able to be a defense contractor and then, you know what I mean, go into- Revolving door.

Yes.

And anything like that probably is a good idea if you can get it passed.

Good luck getting it passed.

But the issue really comes like the major problem

Is that Washington, D.C.

is the most powerful organization in the history of the world, that they spend seven trillion dollars a year.