SPEAKER_02

gave trump an out you know they responded with this nonsense you know the same thing they did after uh um they after trump killed solomony where they fire these rockets they give us advance warning they make sure we move everyone out of the way so because they know they know they don't want to kill an american there because then it's full-scale war but like if they hadn't

You know, it's so funny because, like, we put all of this in the mullahs' hands.

And if they had just decided, which every military analyst concludes they can touch Americans in the region, they didn't.

Had they, this would have been the—and I think that was the goal.

I think that was Netanyahu's goal of it, was to provoke that response that would have led to a regime change war.

And it didn't work.

And Trump, you know, to his credit, his instinct is to de-escalate these things when he can, but also to Trump's—

you know, fault never should have gotten in the thing to begin with.

It was all the whole Iranian nuclear threat is as much bullshit as the Iraqi nuclear threat.

I mean, yeah, it is true that they have a civilian nuclear program that Iraq didn't have.

And it is.

I know I saw when Mike Baker was on who I love.

I love Mike Baker, but I think he's wrong about all this stuff.

But when he was when you even you had said to him at one point where you were like, yeah, but like, you know, the counter argument to that is that this is like a latent nuclear deterrent.

is the idea, not that they're developing a nuclear weapon.

And Mike was basically like, yeah, but they're up to 60%.

And that's on its way to 90%.

But the thing is, why weren't they at 90%?

They didn't have to stop at 60%.

They mastered the fuel cycle and they figured out all this technology a long time ago.