Stefano Ritondale
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
That's what we're providing.
That's what we're providing.
That's what we're providing.
And that's where we really want to say, like, for example, like I said, I use the Mexico feed, right, that our company provides and I analyze. It will say, chapitos state that I want to know that. It could be a lie. It could be an absolute lie. I don't care. I want to know what they're claiming because it matters to specifically how you understand the overall situation. And that's the thing.
And that's where we really want to say, like, for example, like I said, I use the Mexico feed, right, that our company provides and I analyze. It will say, chapitos state that I want to know that. It could be a lie. It could be an absolute lie. I don't care. I want to know what they're claiming because it matters to specifically how you understand the overall situation. And that's the thing.
And that's where we really want to say, like, for example, like I said, I use the Mexico feed, right, that our company provides and I analyze. It will say, chapitos state that I want to know that. It could be a lie. It could be an absolute lie. I don't care. I want to know what they're claiming because it matters to specifically how you understand the overall situation. And that's the thing.
It's the raw data, the information. And it also will maybe, you know, it gets, you know, actual reporting and all that, and it will say it out loud. And I think, you know... For people who, because look, like I mentioned, for example, when we were talking earlier, the New York Times did a phenomenal report about Michoacan, about a specific, like I, that was 100% the New York Times.
It's the raw data, the information. And it also will maybe, you know, it gets, you know, actual reporting and all that, and it will say it out loud. And I think, you know... For people who, because look, like I mentioned, for example, when we were talking earlier, the New York Times did a phenomenal report about Michoacan, about a specific, like I, that was 100% the New York Times.
It's the raw data, the information. And it also will maybe, you know, it gets, you know, actual reporting and all that, and it will say it out loud. And I think, you know... For people who, because look, like I mentioned, for example, when we were talking earlier, the New York Times did a phenomenal report about Michoacan, about a specific, like I, that was 100% the New York Times.
And I think, you know, you can, people can agree or disagree about how news is and all that is done. And I think that's a legitimate fair in a First Amendment country and democracy. You might love it, hate it, and criticize or do it. They provide absolute news. But it's to your point, what we're trying to focus in is that intelligence raw data. Straight to you.
And I think, you know, you can, people can agree or disagree about how news is and all that is done. And I think that's a legitimate fair in a First Amendment country and democracy. You might love it, hate it, and criticize or do it. They provide absolute news. But it's to your point, what we're trying to focus in is that intelligence raw data. Straight to you.
And I think, you know, you can, people can agree or disagree about how news is and all that is done. And I think that's a legitimate fair in a First Amendment country and democracy. You might love it, hate it, and criticize or do it. They provide absolute news. But it's to your point, what we're trying to focus in is that intelligence raw data. Straight to you.
And so when, you know, one of the things we're building, for example, that I think nobody is talking about, which kind of blows my mind, is what's going on in the Democratic Republic of Congo with the region of Goma and their war with the M23 rebels that are Rwanda-backed. That's a huge crisis that's going on that nobody is talking about.
And so when, you know, one of the things we're building, for example, that I think nobody is talking about, which kind of blows my mind, is what's going on in the Democratic Republic of Congo with the region of Goma and their war with the M23 rebels that are Rwanda-backed. That's a huge crisis that's going on that nobody is talking about.
And so when, you know, one of the things we're building, for example, that I think nobody is talking about, which kind of blows my mind, is what's going on in the Democratic Republic of Congo with the region of Goma and their war with the M23 rebels that are Rwanda-backed. That's a huge crisis that's going on that nobody is talking about.
And an interesting fact is the most violent war since World War II. was the Congo wars, the first and second Congo wars that happened between 1996 to 2004. I think over 8 million people died. It was the most violent war since World War II.
And an interesting fact is the most violent war since World War II. was the Congo wars, the first and second Congo wars that happened between 1996 to 2004. I think over 8 million people died. It was the most violent war since World War II.
And an interesting fact is the most violent war since World War II. was the Congo wars, the first and second Congo wars that happened between 1996 to 2004. I think over 8 million people died. It was the most violent war since World War II.
In the Congo. And right now there's a concern is, are we entering the third Congo war right now? Because of the situation of the M23 rebels in Goma in the Democratic Republic of Congo. And we're building that feed. And so it's not, it's again, because it's, Because the US, we focus on America, right? And maybe our interests.
In the Congo. And right now there's a concern is, are we entering the third Congo war right now? Because of the situation of the M23 rebels in Goma in the Democratic Republic of Congo. And we're building that feed. And so it's not, it's again, because it's, Because the US, we focus on America, right? And maybe our interests.