Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Stephen Dubner

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
7195 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

Was your original ending, even if just in your head, as happy an ending as the film ultimately had?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

Was your original ending, even if just in your head, as happy an ending as the film ultimately had?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

In that moment, it will remind many of us of that Proustian rush when Proust eats the madeleine and his entire, you know, childhood life philosophy comes... It all comes rushing back to him and provokes this unbelievable examination of his own life.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

In that moment, it will remind many of us of that Proustian rush when Proust eats the madeleine and his entire, you know, childhood life philosophy comes... It all comes rushing back to him and provokes this unbelievable examination of his own life.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

In that moment, it will remind many of us of that Proustian rush when Proust eats the madeleine and his entire, you know, childhood life philosophy comes... It all comes rushing back to him and provokes this unbelievable examination of his own life.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

In your case, when Anton Ego tastes the ratatouille and has this reverie and trip back to a very different place in time for him, in that case, is the ratatouille, the food itself, an allegory as well, or is it just food?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

In your case, when Anton Ego tastes the ratatouille and has this reverie and trip back to a very different place in time for him, in that case, is the ratatouille, the food itself, an allegory as well, or is it just food?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

In your case, when Anton Ego tastes the ratatouille and has this reverie and trip back to a very different place in time for him, in that case, is the ratatouille, the food itself, an allegory as well, or is it just food?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

So the restaurant critic loves the rat's ratatouille. The rat loves to cook. And Jan Pinkova loves to tell stories about the human condition, sometimes in the form of an animated rat. I asked him if he thinks Ratatouille may have shifted the public's perception of rats.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

So the restaurant critic loves the rat's ratatouille. The rat loves to cook. And Jan Pinkova loves to tell stories about the human condition, sometimes in the form of an animated rat. I asked him if he thinks Ratatouille may have shifted the public's perception of rats.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

So the restaurant critic loves the rat's ratatouille. The rat loves to cook. And Jan Pinkova loves to tell stories about the human condition, sometimes in the form of an animated rat. I asked him if he thinks Ratatouille may have shifted the public's perception of rats.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

I often wonder whether the demonization of the rat is a little bit random and or driven by earlier pop culture references. Because I think about the mouse. We had Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse. Whereas rats, you know, we had Templeton from Charlotte's Web, voiced by Paul Lynn, who is sinister. We had the film Willard. Rats are never the heroes.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

I often wonder whether the demonization of the rat is a little bit random and or driven by earlier pop culture references. Because I think about the mouse. We had Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse. Whereas rats, you know, we had Templeton from Charlotte's Web, voiced by Paul Lynn, who is sinister. We had the film Willard. Rats are never the heroes.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

I often wonder whether the demonization of the rat is a little bit random and or driven by earlier pop culture references. Because I think about the mouse. We had Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse. Whereas rats, you know, we had Templeton from Charlotte's Web, voiced by Paul Lynn, who is sinister. We had the film Willard. Rats are never the heroes.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

None of them are about the soul or the mood or the abilities.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

None of them are about the soul or the mood or the abilities.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

None of them are about the soul or the mood or the abilities.

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

We have to remind ourselves that Jan Pinkava's view of the rat, despite all his research, is a fictional rat. Remy is a chef, after all. And none of the rats in Ratatouille seem bound by the rat's real lifespan of just two or three years. But is Pinkova's view of the rat any less realistic than New York Mayor Eric Adams's view?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

We have to remind ourselves that Jan Pinkava's view of the rat, despite all his research, is a fictional rat. Remy is a chef, after all. And none of the rats in Ratatouille seem bound by the rat's real lifespan of just two or three years. But is Pinkova's view of the rat any less realistic than New York Mayor Eric Adams's view?

Freakonomics Radio
624. The Animal No One Loves, Until They Do

We have to remind ourselves that Jan Pinkava's view of the rat, despite all his research, is a fictional rat. Remy is a chef, after all. And none of the rats in Ratatouille seem bound by the rat's real lifespan of just two or three years. But is Pinkova's view of the rat any less realistic than New York Mayor Eric Adams's view?