Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Stephen Dubner

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
7195 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

Here's a sentence from the book Jacket that I particularly love. When Rebecca Allensworth began attending board meetings, she discovered a thicket of self-dealing and ineptitude. The self-dealing we can get to later. Let me hear a favorite example of ineptitude.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

Here's a sentence from the book Jacket that I particularly love. When Rebecca Allensworth began attending board meetings, she discovered a thicket of self-dealing and ineptitude. The self-dealing we can get to later. Let me hear a favorite example of ineptitude.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

Here's a sentence from the book Jacket that I particularly love. When Rebecca Allensworth began attending board meetings, she discovered a thicket of self-dealing and ineptitude. The self-dealing we can get to later. Let me hear a favorite example of ineptitude.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

So it's really interesting reading about all the reasons for that and all the ways in which a licensing board, even if well-intentioned, is underpowered. That would seem to be most prominent in medical boards, right?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

So it's really interesting reading about all the reasons for that and all the ways in which a licensing board, even if well-intentioned, is underpowered. That would seem to be most prominent in medical boards, right?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

So it's really interesting reading about all the reasons for that and all the ways in which a licensing board, even if well-intentioned, is underpowered. That would seem to be most prominent in medical boards, right?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

You write that licensing boards, quote, combine the most dangerous features of a professional association. And I have to say, I'd never really thought about professional associations as dangerous before. And the government agency boards have all the interests and incentives of a private club and the police power of the state to back them up.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

You write that licensing boards, quote, combine the most dangerous features of a professional association. And I have to say, I'd never really thought about professional associations as dangerous before. And the government agency boards have all the interests and incentives of a private club and the police power of the state to back them up.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

You write that licensing boards, quote, combine the most dangerous features of a professional association. And I have to say, I'd never really thought about professional associations as dangerous before. And the government agency boards have all the interests and incentives of a private club and the police power of the state to back them up.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

When I first read that, I was sure that you were overstating your case. By the time I finished your book, I was pretty certain that you weren't. But if I read that out of context, I might take you for some kind of deep state conspiracist. Maybe you are, but can you give me a sense of why you've got such a harsh indictment in that sentence?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

When I first read that, I was sure that you were overstating your case. By the time I finished your book, I was pretty certain that you weren't. But if I read that out of context, I might take you for some kind of deep state conspiracist. Maybe you are, but can you give me a sense of why you've got such a harsh indictment in that sentence?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

When I first read that, I was sure that you were overstating your case. By the time I finished your book, I was pretty certain that you weren't. But if I read that out of context, I might take you for some kind of deep state conspiracist. Maybe you are, but can you give me a sense of why you've got such a harsh indictment in that sentence?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

There's more than that. They may have a license, but there's a lot that can be buried within a valid license that is still not very good for consumers.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

There's more than that. They may have a license, but there's a lot that can be buried within a valid license that is still not very good for consumers.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

There's more than that. They may have a license, but there's a lot that can be buried within a valid license that is still not very good for consumers.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

And in that case, who were the members of the board? Did they have any relationship with the person whose license was being considered?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

And in that case, who were the members of the board? Did they have any relationship with the person whose license was being considered?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

And in that case, who were the members of the board? Did they have any relationship with the person whose license was being considered?

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

You cite many examples of professionals who face discipline from their licensing board, but then they encounter, as you put it, a system full of second, third, and even fifth chances. And you write that a lot of these regulatory failures come from the most legitimate professions, you call them, like medicine. Talk about the Michael LaPaglia story.

Freakonomics Radio
621. Is Professional Licensing a Racket?

You cite many examples of professionals who face discipline from their licensing board, but then they encounter, as you put it, a system full of second, third, and even fifth chances. And you write that a lot of these regulatory failures come from the most legitimate professions, you call them, like medicine. Talk about the Michael LaPaglia story.