Stephen K. Bannon

attractions to people of the same sex or wanting to be a different sex or whatever.

So that's a triumph that we think will lead to really favorable decisions in two cases that we have about suppression of medical speech, one in California, one in Washington space.

So that's sort of bright news in the Maha coalition right now, but I can tell you about some of the issues.

Exactly.

And they said that therapists, doctors, professionals should be able to exercise free speech.

They were suppressing this therapist's speech.

And that's dangerous to all of us, Steve, right?

If we can't have open communication with our doctors, with our therapists, like what happened in COVID, we're in terrible trouble.

And so we expect now, based on this Supreme Court decision...

that our case in California, where first the state and then the medical board tried to suppress accurate speech around COVID, we're expecting that that case is now going to be decided favorably, probably sent back by the Supreme Court.

But it's incredibly dangerous when a state says to a professional, particularly a doctor,

You can't have this speech with your patient or your client.

So that's what it's about.

Even Justice Kagan, who probably doesn't agree with the outcome, said it's a straightforward First Amendment issue.

And Justice Sotomayor joined with her.

The only dissident there was Justice Jackson, who in Missouri v. Biden had said what I consider to be bizarre things about how

You know, we can't let the First Amendment hamper the government.

No, that's the whole point, is that the government doesn't get to take sides because we in this democracy believe in the free marketplace of ideas.

Well, let me tell you where there's sort of clearly, you know, there has arisen kind of this issue within the Maha Maga Coalition, and that is around the use of the pesticide glyphosate.

Glyphosate is a poison.