Stephen K. Bannon

I don't think he went after NATO as hard as as hard as he as hard as he won it.

If you're sitting there, if you're Starmer tonight and supposedly he's convening tomorrow afternoon, I think it's 24 nations to talk about some sort of coalition that would come in after the fact and keep the Straits of Hormuz somehow open for business.

And we haven't seen, obviously, 24 nations, including, I think, the Arab nations and all the NATO nations.

If you're Starmer tonight, you just heard the president.

What is your takeaway?

No, no interoperability, very little equipment, et cetera.

Before I let you go, one of the engine room people are saying, did you actually interpret what he said that if he can't get some sort of ceasefire or potential deal that he can't have some sort of relationship that he will ramp up, actually go after the energy grid and go after the oil?

Is that a threat of escalation?

How do people get you?

Where do we go to get your reporting, sir?

Jack, your assessment of what you heard tonight from the president, you and I talked a lot about this during the day.

Did he stick the landing?

Steve, I think he did.

And one of the big takeaways for me and hearing all the incredible analysis here on Real America's Voice, I concur with so many of our colleagues, but

One of the big takeaways for me is that we had heard so much reporting throughout the day from some of these outlets that have really been pushing for a wider war, saying that he was going to announce a full-on ground campaign, a ground invasion tonight, perhaps a Karg Island invasion.

And we didn't hear any of that.

We didn't hear a mention of Karg Island.

We didn't hear a mention of ground troops.

He certainly congratulated the troops.

He certainly said he supports the troops.