Stephen K. Bannon

No, but of course, we're in a new world now, as Justice Alito pointed out to, where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who's a U.S.

citizen.

It is, and as Justice Scalia said, I think in the case that Justice Alito was referring to, you've got a constitutional provision that addresses certain evils, and it should be extended to reasonably comparable evils.

He said that about statutory interpretation.

I think the same principle applies here, and I think we quote that in our brief.

Let me ask you about NATO.

You said that our NATO allies have been disappointing specifically.

I know you're talking about Spain, Great Britain, France, even Italy now.

And that after all of this is done, we will reexamine this relationship.

And especially when it comes to we pay two thirds of the freight when it comes to NATO defense.

The question is whether or not Trump is seen as a reliable partner by NATO allies.

Would he actually come to the defense of a NATO ally if they were attacked by Russia or by someone else?

You obviously put a lot of weight on subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

But the examples you give to support that strike me as very quirky.

The stuff you have about unlawfully present is like Roman law sources you're going to.

There are people who are subject to removal at any time if they are apprehended and they go through the proper procedures.

But they have...

in their minds, made a permanent home here and have established roots.

And that raises a humanitarian problem.

It certainly wasn't a problem in the 19th century.