Stephen Stockwell

I grew up, you know, mum and dad, mum's a nurse, dad's a paramedic.

And so we were kind of having conversations about stuff like this while we were having dinner a lot of the time.

Yeah.

I think I've got a slightly skewed approach to it.

But there were decisions we were making.

There were things, you know, while we're talking about, you know, some of the stuff we did include in the podcast, there were things that we spoke about that we didn't end up including in the podcast.

Because we realised that actually, look, that's very confronting and the jury's heard that, but it doesn't add much to kind of what we've explained and what we've done here.

So some of those things were taken out.

So there is a decision that we're having and we're not just including every single thing just for the sake of gore.

It has to add to the story and needs to be a reason that we're including it and we're talking about it.

Right, Eva?

Yeah, absolutely, Eva.

And this kind of leads into the next question that we've been sent from Izzy.

I mean, there was so much confronting evidence presented in this trial.

And Izzy emailed wondering kind of what sort of mental health supports available to jurors who witnessed this, who had to sit through and hear all of this?

Yeah, absolutely.

Wonderful question, Izzy, and it's nice to know that the listeners to the case of have this care for the jury and the people that are experiencing this stuff as well.

We've really appreciated everybody's feedback, not just the emails that have been sent to the case of.

Eva also had some quite direct feedback in the courtroom as well, right?

Yes.