Steve Bannon

You know, they say 1.5 million, but it's really almost two and a half million barrels of oil a day to leave Iran that funds the mullahs and goes to the Straits of Hormuz to the Straits of Malacca to China. And it's 22 percent to 25 percent of China's output of which, oh, by the way, we're engaged in an economic crisis. war right now.

I think going up the escalatory ladder, which would say, hey, I've been in a carrier battle group off the coast of Iran for the hostage crisis in the Persian Gulf. We've got two carrier battle groups right now in the Red Sea keeping the Suez Canal open.

I think going up the escalatory ladder, which would say, hey, I've been in a carrier battle group off the coast of Iran for the hostage crisis in the Persian Gulf. We've got two carrier battle groups right now in the Red Sea keeping the Suez Canal open.

I think going up the escalatory ladder, which would say, hey, I've been in a carrier battle group off the coast of Iran for the hostage crisis in the Persian Gulf. We've got two carrier battle groups right now in the Red Sea keeping the Suez Canal open.

Just move one over to in front of the Straits of Hormuz, and let's do a blockade, a naval quarantine of everything, and the mullahs will be gone in 100 days. Now, you're going up the escalatory ladder, but I think all of this in the Pentagon, gets down to a major fissure on really our national security policy going forward.

Just move one over to in front of the Straits of Hormuz, and let's do a blockade, a naval quarantine of everything, and the mullahs will be gone in 100 days. Now, you're going up the escalatory ladder, but I think all of this in the Pentagon, gets down to a major fissure on really our national security policy going forward.

Just move one over to in front of the Straits of Hormuz, and let's do a blockade, a naval quarantine of everything, and the mullahs will be gone in 100 days. Now, you're going up the escalatory ladder, but I think all of this in the Pentagon, gets down to a major fissure on really our national security policy going forward.

And are we prepared to get sucked back into an open conflict in the Middle East again?

And are we prepared to get sucked back into an open conflict in the Middle East again?

And are we prepared to get sucked back into an open conflict in the Middle East again?

I see your analysis, and I'm going to disagree, and here's why. I think there's not, and this is why the promotions under Bush and Obama and President Trump the first time with Mattis and these guys. We took down the caliphate, but remember, the center of gravity of U.S. foreign policy and military and the defense contractors is big army, big operations in CENTCOM in the Middle East.

I see your analysis, and I'm going to disagree, and here's why. I think there's not, and this is why the promotions under Bush and Obama and President Trump the first time with Mattis and these guys. We took down the caliphate, but remember, the center of gravity of U.S. foreign policy and military and the defense contractors is big army, big operations in CENTCOM in the Middle East.

I see your analysis, and I'm going to disagree, and here's why. I think there's not, and this is why the promotions under Bush and Obama and President Trump the first time with Mattis and these guys. We took down the caliphate, but remember, the center of gravity of U.S. foreign policy and military and the defense contractors is big army, big operations in CENTCOM in the Middle East.

It shouldn't be lost on the chats. When you're doing the signal chat, The one thing that jumps off the page at you is President Trump is not engaged with these guys in a real-time basis. Who is he talking to in a real-time? Go back and look at the chats. They're kind of throwing up ideas and getting them up to speed.

It shouldn't be lost on the chats. When you're doing the signal chat, The one thing that jumps off the page at you is President Trump is not engaged with these guys in a real-time basis. Who is he talking to in a real-time? Go back and look at the chats. They're kind of throwing up ideas and getting them up to speed.

It shouldn't be lost on the chats. When you're doing the signal chat, The one thing that jumps off the page at you is President Trump is not engaged with these guys in a real-time basis. Who is he talking to in a real-time? Go back and look at the chats. They're kind of throwing up ideas and getting them up to speed.

They're directly talking to the combatant commander in CENTCOM on the Houthi thing. President Trump is engaged directly with the combatant commander right there at CENTCOM. CENTCOM is the center of gravity. This is why Obama failed on the pivot to Asia. All the pivot to Asia- Wait, wait, wait.

They're directly talking to the combatant commander in CENTCOM on the Houthi thing. President Trump is engaged directly with the combatant commander right there at CENTCOM. CENTCOM is the center of gravity. This is why Obama failed on the pivot to Asia. All the pivot to Asia- Wait, wait, wait.

They're directly talking to the combatant commander in CENTCOM on the Houthi thing. President Trump is engaged directly with the combatant commander right there at CENTCOM. CENTCOM is the center of gravity. This is why Obama failed on the pivot to Asia. All the pivot to Asia- Wait, wait, wait.

Why would they leak that? Here's why. Because because the strategic endeavor of President Trump is a hemispheric defense. It's to get off the Eurasian landmass in a direct military comfort. Look, you look at NATO, you look at the Gulf. in the Middle East, you look around to the Straits of Malacca, the South China Sea, you look up to Korea and Japan.