Steve Bannon

And this is why he said, if I can't get a deal, we'll take out the grid and maybe even get to taking out their energy resources because that would get you to 150 bucks pretty quickly.

My understanding.

And so do you have information out there that is differently that...

since they did it at Tehran a couple of three Saturdays ago.

And then the inflection point of this war was attacking the Qatar's gas field, the joint gas field they managed with the Iranians that the president in no uncertain terms told BB, Hey, that's not to happen again.

And that is a standing order.

You think they, you think that America's greatest ally would actually go against a direct command of the commander in chief to take it upon themselves to attack Iran.

the oil infrastructure and gas infrastructure of the Iranians, sir?

Did you, Brandon Weikert said, we only got a couple minutes.

I appreciate your time.

I know you got to bounce.

Brandon Weikert said he thought the speech teed up the possibility of actual ground troops.

I took it the exact opposite.

but I'm just one voice in the wilderness here.

Did you take it that the president actually implied we could have the insertion of ground troops given his speech last night?

And so you think when he says two or three weeks, we will have all of our objectives, and he went through those objectives again as Ruby has been pitching them, all of those objectives, which can be done essentially by air, do you still believe it leaves open the possibility of ground combat troops?

And you don't believe that that speech last night was the tee up for that?

In fact, it was barely – I think Israel was only mentioned once, and he did give a shout-out to the Arabs as being involved in this.

And the one thing I would disagree with the president, I don't think they've been engaged at all.

In fact, the Jerusalem Post is reporting counter to the Wall Street Journal that UAE actually –