Steve Bannon

and they don't like the people who are coming here because they don't look like them they don't sound like them they don't have their hair like them they don't they don't talk like they don't make the movements that they've defined as american so if nothing else the supreme court tomorrow from where i see can settle that piece that this you were born here

You're an American citizen, regardless of your parents' status, regardless of your granddaddy's status, regardless of the color of your skin or where you're from.

That, to me, is an important aspect of this.

The flip side of that coin is what Donald Trump thinks, and I would love to get your thoughts when you look at those two pieces.

Donald Trump thinks that his way to win the argument is to basically crap all over the judges.

Right.

So if your question is, could it be messy if the Supreme Court goes the other way?

Yeah, absolutely.

And most recently, Simone, in the tariffs case, without getting into sort of the nuts and bolts of it,

The Supreme Court ruled one way, but didn't quite explain how the remedy would work.

So is this a proactive remedy, meaning only children subsequently born?

That's what the executive order seems to posit.

Is it a retroactive order, meaning it would apply to people already?

born in this country who we believe are citizens?

But in terms of fashioning a remedy, if the Supreme Court rules contrary to our common understanding, you're right.

It could be messy.

Tell me, because we use the oil market as an information provider right now.

I think West Texas is over, what, $104, $105 a barrel.

Brent is up to $114, $115.

The market today, correct me if I'm wrong, has not really bought into the fact that