Steve Inskeep

I mean, as of yesterday, we have a full embargo on Chinese goods.

Some of that's starting to come through as we alleviate somewhat. Does he look weak by changing all the time? I don't think he looks weak.

Some of that's starting to come through as we alleviate somewhat. Does he look weak by changing all the time? I don't think he looks weak.

Some of that's starting to come through as we alleviate somewhat. Does he look weak by changing all the time? I don't think he looks weak.

I give him a list of 200 faculty members and 200 administrators. We're cutting off all federal money. All federal money until they're gone. Once they're gone, we'll start bleeding it back in. And oh, by the way, all 350,000 Chinese nationals, students that are here in the country, got to leave immediately.

I give him a list of 200 faculty members and 200 administrators. We're cutting off all federal money. All federal money until they're gone. Once they're gone, we'll start bleeding it back in. And oh, by the way, all 350,000 Chinese nationals, students that are here in the country, got to leave immediately.

I give him a list of 200 faculty members and 200 administrators. We're cutting off all federal money. All federal money until they're gone. Once they're gone, we'll start bleeding it back in. And oh, by the way, all 350,000 Chinese nationals, students that are here in the country, got to leave immediately.

A judicial insurrection.

A judicial insurrection.

A judicial insurrection.

You've got a judge.

You've got a judge.

You've got a judge.

It bothers me that a court—we never had— there's no way in the Constitution it talks about judicial supremacy. Nowhere in the Constitution talks about judicial supremacy. What you're seeing is a court trying to step between President Trump and his – Isn't it just a court checking it against the law to say that's illegal, not legal? his role as commander-in-chief.

It bothers me that a court—we never had— there's no way in the Constitution it talks about judicial supremacy. Nowhere in the Constitution talks about judicial supremacy. What you're seeing is a court trying to step between President Trump and his – Isn't it just a court checking it against the law to say that's illegal, not legal? his role as commander-in-chief.

It bothers me that a court—we never had— there's no way in the Constitution it talks about judicial supremacy. Nowhere in the Constitution talks about judicial supremacy. What you're seeing is a court trying to step between President Trump and his – Isn't it just a court checking it against the law to say that's illegal, not legal? his role as commander-in-chief.

This happened before in our country. It's happened a couple times. A guy named Abraham Lincoln.

This happened before in our country. It's happened a couple times. A guy named Abraham Lincoln.

This happened before in our country. It's happened a couple times. A guy named Abraham Lincoln.

If every one of these criminal terrorists have due process that's 200 years before they get out, it's not going to happen. It's just not going to happen. The American people back Trump on this, and they have to go, and they're going to go.