Steve Klabnik

I mean, to the contrary of being a popularity contest, I mean, how many crates have you gone to? that have a really thoughtful, like see these other crates section. And I really appreciate it because not that they're apologizing for existing, but explaining like, no, this is not NIH.

I mean, to the contrary of being a popularity contest, I mean, how many crates have you gone to? that have a really thoughtful, like see these other crates section. And I really appreciate it because not that they're apologizing for existing, but explaining like, no, this is not NIH.

Like I built this because I looked at these other things and I evaluated them and they didn't meet my needs, but they probably do meet your needs. So like, don't use my thing just because I built it. Like go use the thing that meets your needs. It's incredibly thoughtful.

Like I built this because I looked at these other things and I evaluated them and they didn't meet my needs, but they probably do meet your needs. So like, don't use my thing just because I built it. Like go use the thing that meets your needs. It's incredibly thoughtful.

Yeah. I remember that being something, I'm not sure if we did open an issue or not, but yeah.

Yeah. I remember that being something, I'm not sure if we did open an issue or not, but yeah.

I don't know about the specific differences, but Cliff definitely looked at Postcard whenever we were doing the Hubris serialization stuff. It definitely took a lot of inspiration from it, but did ultimately decide to design his own thing.

I don't know about the specific differences, but Cliff definitely looked at Postcard whenever we were doing the Hubris serialization stuff. It definitely took a lot of inspiration from it, but did ultimately decide to design his own thing.

Yeah, this is great. I've known about this for a while, unlike some folks. But I've sort of resisted using it just because it felt heavyweight, if you know what I mean. I think exactly as you're saying, Rainn, about this this kind of dichotomy between kind of big framework versus kind of lean and mean. Um, but this is a great endorsement and a good reminder to go at least kick the tires.

Yeah, this is great. I've known about this for a while, unlike some folks. But I've sort of resisted using it just because it felt heavyweight, if you know what I mean. I think exactly as you're saying, Rainn, about this this kind of dichotomy between kind of big framework versus kind of lean and mean. Um, but this is a great endorsement and a good reminder to go at least kick the tires.

Next time I come across a problem that feels like it might be up at graphs, graphs, um, alley.

Next time I come across a problem that feels like it might be up at graphs, graphs, um, alley.

So where, where did I hear about it?

So where, where did I hear about it?

I don't know. I mean, I guess just other podcasts. I don't know, but I, I, you know, I think I was looking for it. I didn't realize that we did. Do we have an open relationship like that?

I don't know. I mean, I guess just other podcasts. I don't know, but I, I, you know, I think I was looking for it. I didn't realize that we did. Do we have an open relationship like that?

You're the one who appears on all these other podcasts.

You're the one who appears on all these other podcasts.

Now we're here. So in the typify create that I wrote to do JSON schema to Rust code generation, there's a bunch of graph-like problems to it. In particular, you've got to find cycles. And if you find a cycle, you want to break it with a box as you generate this kind of containment cycle. As you look at derives, you kind of maybe want to look at strongly connected components.

Now we're here. So in the typify create that I wrote to do JSON schema to Rust code generation, there's a bunch of graph-like problems to it. In particular, you've got to find cycles. And if you find a cycle, you want to break it with a box as you generate this kind of containment cycle. As you look at derives, you kind of maybe want to look at strongly connected components.