Steven Bonnell (Destiny)

Didn't say genocide.

Didn't say genocide.

Use the word Amalek because the Hamas are a really good organization, if I may.

Use the word Amalek because the Hamas are a really good organization, if I may.

Use the word Amalek because the Hamas are a really good organization, if I may.

So for the ICJ case that South Africa's brought, I think there's a couple things that need to be mentioned. One is, and I saw you two talk at length about this, the plausibility standard is incredibly low. The only thing we're looking for is a basic presentation of facts that make it conceivable, possible, plausible, which legally, this is obviously below criminal conviction.

So for the ICJ case that South Africa's brought, I think there's a couple things that need to be mentioned. One is, and I saw you two talk at length about this, the plausibility standard is incredibly low. The only thing we're looking for is a basic presentation of facts that make it conceivable, possible, plausible, which legally, this is obviously below criminal conviction.

So for the ICJ case that South Africa's brought, I think there's a couple things that need to be mentioned. One is, and I saw you two talk at length about this, the plausibility standard is incredibly low. The only thing we're looking for is a basic presentation of facts that make it conceivable, possible, plausible, which legally, this is obviously below criminal conviction.

Think of it as an indictment. Sure, possibly. Maybe even at a lower level than even an indictment. So plausibility is an incredibly low standard, number one.

Think of it as an indictment. Sure, possibly. Maybe even at a lower level than even an indictment. So plausibility is an incredibly low standard, number one.

Think of it as an indictment. Sure, possibly. Maybe even at a lower level than even an indictment. So plausibility is an incredibly low standard, number one.

Number two, if you actually go through and you read the complaint that South Africa filed, I would say that if you go through the quotes and you even follow through to the source of the quotes, the misrepresentation that South Africa does in their case about all of these horrendous quotes, in my opinion, borders on criminal. Well, 16 ICJ judges disagree. That's fine if 16 ICJ judges disagree.

Number two, if you actually go through and you read the complaint that South Africa filed, I would say that if you go through the quotes and you even follow through to the source of the quotes, the misrepresentation that South Africa does in their case about all of these horrendous quotes, in my opinion, borders on criminal. Well, 16 ICJ judges disagree. That's fine if 16 ICJ judges disagree.

Number two, if you actually go through and you read the complaint that South Africa filed, I would say that if you go through the quotes and you even follow through to the source of the quotes, the misrepresentation that South Africa does in their case about all of these horrendous quotes, in my opinion, borders on criminal. Well, 16 ICJ judges disagree. That's fine if 16 ICJ judges disagree.

You know, they could be.

You know, they could be.

You know, they could be.

This is based on the official ICJ report that was released. I'm not sure if you read the entire thing or not. I read every aspect. Okay, that's great. Did you go through and actually identify any of the sources for the underlying quotes?

This is based on the official ICJ report that was released. I'm not sure if you read the entire thing or not. I read every aspect. Okay, that's great. Did you go through and actually identify any of the sources for the underlying quotes?

This is based on the official ICJ report that was released. I'm not sure if you read the entire thing or not. I read every aspect. Okay, that's great. Did you go through and actually identify any of the sources for the underlying quotes?