Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Steven Zuber

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
1466 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

Again, Todd is already integrated.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

Deintegrating will take a while.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

Integrating TrapGPT will take a long time.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

So, like, there's still lots of

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

I think at the low range weeks of time where nothing can really move forward yet.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

I had heard about the RSP thing, and I'm sure you guys know more than me, and I'm eager to hear it.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

But my first thought was, like, keeping in mind that I still think Anthropic are the good guys.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

what they're really saying is like, look, we can't, if, if we, if we commit, if we stick to this commitment of responsible scaling, we're going to fall out of the race and kind of the world might depend on us winning it.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

And so we're, we're like, we're going to try and play things as safe as we can while still moving forward as quickly as we can, which I, that there's almost a contradiction in terms, but not, not quite.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

Cause I think safety is still an explicit goal, but it's more just like, okay, yeah, we, we, we can't let everyone, uh,

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

run ahead of us capabilities-wise, right?

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

And so, I don't know.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

I was more sympathetic to it, but I understand.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

That sounds like kind of what I was guessing, that it was their core point there.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

That's what I was going to say, is I think it would have made a better game theoretic optimization strategy for everyone to say, hey, look, I mean, this has been the case that Eliezer made, what, three, four years ago in that Times article, two or three years?

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

Like, yeah, everyone take a step back, let's catch our breath, do this thing properly, or we're all going to fucking die.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

And I think that, yeah, it would have been awesome if they'd said, hey, look, let's talk about this, and let's all agree as the major players in this game to slow down a little bit.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

But you're right, one of the major players is Sam Altman, who would say, of course, yeah, you bet, and then not do it.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

I totally agree, because I may be a bit biased.

The Bayesian Conspiracy
257 โ€“ Pentagon Comes For Claude

I admit I'm biased in favor of liking Anthropic, but the same way that I'm biased in liking you guys, that if I learned that one of you had said, I'm going to find some human-level equivalent of this kind of thing, I'd be like, all right, well, why would Matt or Inyash do that?