Stu

You usually very much stay away from this sort of thing. So, I mean, I'm interested to see where this goes.

I mean, no, if that's what's happening, no. Not like this. If that's what's happening.

I mean, no, if that's what's happening, no. Not like this. If that's what's happening.

I mean, no, if that's what's happening, no. Not like this. If that's what's happening.

Why would we think it's changed? I'm thinking because it's two different agencies. There's a distinction there. But maybe there's not. What do you mean there's two different agencies? Well, you're thinking of like, you know, the FBI and the DOJ.

Why would we think it's changed? I'm thinking because it's two different agencies. There's a distinction there. But maybe there's not. What do you mean there's two different agencies? Well, you're thinking of like, you know, the FBI and the DOJ.

Why would we think it's changed? I'm thinking because it's two different agencies. There's a distinction there. But maybe there's not. What do you mean there's two different agencies? Well, you're thinking of like, you know, the FBI and the DOJ.

they have influence over one has influence over the other so typically that's not the way it works we're like you know and obviously the as you point out i guess i'm i'm making it too specific but like the executive has uh has certainly has agency over the fbi and we've seen those things happen in the past so yes historically we've seen those types of things but it is i it still seems notable to me but see i don't think because if we broke it down to a local level as opposed to a national level yeah

they have influence over one has influence over the other so typically that's not the way it works we're like you know and obviously the as you point out i guess i'm i'm making it too specific but like the executive has uh has certainly has agency over the fbi and we've seen those things happen in the past so yes historically we've seen those types of things but it is i it still seems notable to me but see i don't think because if we broke it down to a local level as opposed to a national level yeah

they have influence over one has influence over the other so typically that's not the way it works we're like you know and obviously the as you point out i guess i'm i'm making it too specific but like the executive has uh has certainly has agency over the fbi and we've seen those things happen in the past so yes historically we've seen those types of things but it is i it still seems notable to me but see i don't think because if we broke it down to a local level as opposed to a national level yeah

I mean, there are territorial disputes, but this one does seem significant. So let me ask you this, Glenn. You mentioned three things earlier in the show that you thought could be the reason.

I mean, there are territorial disputes, but this one does seem significant. So let me ask you this, Glenn. You mentioned three things earlier in the show that you thought could be the reason.

I mean, there are territorial disputes, but this one does seem significant. So let me ask you this, Glenn. You mentioned three things earlier in the show that you thought could be the reason.

No, we're not going to do a Rick Perry thing where you get halfway through. I don't remember what I just said, like right at the beginning of the sentence. I remember two of them off the top of my head, which one of them was the FBI's withholding documents, like this, essentially the straight... what we're hearing from the administration, from Bondi. That's true. That's one possibility.

No, we're not going to do a Rick Perry thing where you get halfway through. I don't remember what I just said, like right at the beginning of the sentence. I remember two of them off the top of my head, which one of them was the FBI's withholding documents, like this, essentially the straight... what we're hearing from the administration, from Bondi. That's true. That's one possibility.

No, we're not going to do a Rick Perry thing where you get halfway through. I don't remember what I just said, like right at the beginning of the sentence. I remember two of them off the top of my head, which one of them was the FBI's withholding documents, like this, essentially the straight... what we're hearing from the administration, from Bondi. That's true. That's one possibility.

Another possibility, you mentioned kind of this 5D chess type of situation where this is kind of being used as an entry point to be able to kind of clear out that office. They realize that if they kind of point the blame on them,

Another possibility, you mentioned kind of this 5D chess type of situation where this is kind of being used as an entry point to be able to kind of clear out that office. They realize that if they kind of point the blame on them,

Another possibility, you mentioned kind of this 5D chess type of situation where this is kind of being used as an entry point to be able to kind of clear out that office. They realize that if they kind of point the blame on them,

Well, I think in that one, it could go either way, right? It could be legitimate or not legitimate. Yeah, I would only support it if it was legitimate.