Suresh Muthulingam

It's quite challenging.

So if you can do a review, that is great.

Or more importantly, you can be a little bit more careful when you are actually putting together the team.

Just don't put together all the people because you find them.

Try to look at their history, whether they have had successful projects

earlier and try to bring together people who have demonstrated success especially in such settings and more importantly we find that the person who puts together the team plays a critical role so this person like in the movie industry it is the executive producers and producers who put together the team so whoever is the person who is in charge of putting together the team if they are able to if you select that person carefully

If that person has a history of success of doing things well, then most more likely they will put together a team that has a higher chance of executing the project with success.

Absolutely.

I mean, a failure is only useful once you have reflected on it, diagnosed it, and then you internalize the lessons and you can act on them.

I have not yet really gone into that details.

But maybe the thing I do is I really reflect on movies and think about them a bit more carefully.

What's the team that's worked on that?

Thank you, David.

Absolute pleasure.

Thank you, David.

Glad to be here.

Yeah, so the main issue really in the movie industry or with teams which have similar characteristics is that after you complete the project or you complete the movie, there is a gap between the time you finish the movie and the time you get to know about the results.

So what happens is the team gets disbanded after the movie is done.

And they have moved on.

So there is no clear way for them to analyze what went right or what went wrong.