Susan Spencer

The defense says police never revealed to either side exactly how far they went to get Masters to incriminate himself.

The defense says police never revealed to either side exactly how far they went to get Masters to incriminate himself.

but this was equal opportunity withholding. Material wasn't turned over to the defense, but not to prosecutors either. Broderick concedes it may not look very good. So you're just sitting there listening to them say, there's this, this, this, and this, and this looks like a frame job.

but this was equal opportunity withholding. Material wasn't turned over to the defense, but not to prosecutors either. Broderick concedes it may not look very good. So you're just sitting there listening to them say, there's this, this, this, and this, and this looks like a frame job.

but this was equal opportunity withholding. Material wasn't turned over to the defense, but not to prosecutors either. Broderick concedes it may not look very good. So you're just sitting there listening to them say, there's this, this, this, and this, and this looks like a frame job.

He says that while he may not have turned over all his notes, the defense had the same information in reports he did turn over.

He says that while he may not have turned over all his notes, the defense had the same information in reports he did turn over.

He says that while he may not have turned over all his notes, the defense had the same information in reports he did turn over.

One special prosecutor's report called aspects of the police investigation disturbing.

One special prosecutor's report called aspects of the police investigation disturbing.

One special prosecutor's report called aspects of the police investigation disturbing.

But Don Quick insists that not only was it not a frame-up, the work of Broderick, a 29-year veteran cop, was meticulous and detailed. But all the things that didn't get turned over are things that potentially could have helped the defense. Yes. I mean, it doesn't seem to be any omission of things that hurt the defense. I would agree with your characterization.

But Don Quick insists that not only was it not a frame-up, the work of Broderick, a 29-year veteran cop, was meticulous and detailed. But all the things that didn't get turned over are things that potentially could have helped the defense. Yes. I mean, it doesn't seem to be any omission of things that hurt the defense. I would agree with your characterization.

But Don Quick insists that not only was it not a frame-up, the work of Broderick, a 29-year veteran cop, was meticulous and detailed. But all the things that didn't get turned over are things that potentially could have helped the defense. Yes. I mean, it doesn't seem to be any omission of things that hurt the defense. I would agree with your characterization.

And the question is, why was just exculpatory stuff withheld?

And the question is, why was just exculpatory stuff withheld?

And the question is, why was just exculpatory stuff withheld?

So any mistakes that were made here were honest mistakes? Sure.

So any mistakes that were made here were honest mistakes? Sure.

So any mistakes that were made here were honest mistakes? Sure.