Tanya Mosley

Okay, just to slow down a little bit, one point of contention, or it seems like over the course of many lawsuits, something that is often debated is what is considered a public figure. So in this case, what is considered a public figure?

Okay, just to slow down a little bit, one point of contention, or it seems like over the course of many lawsuits, something that is often debated is what is considered a public figure. So in this case, what is considered a public figure?

Okay, just to slow down a little bit, one point of contention, or it seems like over the course of many lawsuits, something that is often debated is what is considered a public figure. So in this case, what is considered a public figure?

Can you also define for us the malice standard? Can someone just sue and win if an article is just wrong or filled with errors? Like what is considered malice?

Can you also define for us the malice standard? Can someone just sue and win if an article is just wrong or filled with errors? Like what is considered malice?

Can you also define for us the malice standard? Can someone just sue and win if an article is just wrong or filled with errors? Like what is considered malice?

This case, as you have been saying, really did usher in really a new age of American journalism as we know it today. I mean, Watergate was one notable story. Reporters could now go after those types of stories without fear. I'm really curious about prior to the Sullivan case, had there been lawsuits that were filed, defamation lawsuits or lawsuits about errors? Yeah.

This case, as you have been saying, really did usher in really a new age of American journalism as we know it today. I mean, Watergate was one notable story. Reporters could now go after those types of stories without fear. I'm really curious about prior to the Sullivan case, had there been lawsuits that were filed, defamation lawsuits or lawsuits about errors? Yeah.

This case, as you have been saying, really did usher in really a new age of American journalism as we know it today. I mean, Watergate was one notable story. Reporters could now go after those types of stories without fear. I'm really curious about prior to the Sullivan case, had there been lawsuits that were filed, defamation lawsuits or lawsuits about errors? Yeah.

Let's get into the current day effort to dismantle Sullivan. You write about the lawyers behind this effort. I'll just say the whole time I'm reading about them in your book, I mean, it really feels and sounds like something out of a movie. Share a little bit about how they are moving in this moment behind the scenes, two of them in particular, Tom Clare and Libby Locke.

Let's get into the current day effort to dismantle Sullivan. You write about the lawyers behind this effort. I'll just say the whole time I'm reading about them in your book, I mean, it really feels and sounds like something out of a movie. Share a little bit about how they are moving in this moment behind the scenes, two of them in particular, Tom Clare and Libby Locke.

Let's get into the current day effort to dismantle Sullivan. You write about the lawyers behind this effort. I'll just say the whole time I'm reading about them in your book, I mean, it really feels and sounds like something out of a movie. Share a little bit about how they are moving in this moment behind the scenes, two of them in particular, Tom Clare and Libby Locke.

And can you remind me the around the year again? I'm sorry, as I'm following you.

And can you remind me the around the year again? I'm sorry, as I'm following you.

And can you remind me the around the year again? I'm sorry, as I'm following you.

You know, there's an argument to be made that Like in the case of the Rolling Stone article, there's a lot of shoddy or questionable reporting out there. I think someone from the Heritage Foundation told you that if an outlet is publishing a story that is accurate and newsworthy, then they don't have to worry about being sued. Really, the case that you're making is that that's not enough.

You know, there's an argument to be made that Like in the case of the Rolling Stone article, there's a lot of shoddy or questionable reporting out there. I think someone from the Heritage Foundation told you that if an outlet is publishing a story that is accurate and newsworthy, then they don't have to worry about being sued. Really, the case that you're making is that that's not enough.

You know, there's an argument to be made that Like in the case of the Rolling Stone article, there's a lot of shoddy or questionable reporting out there. I think someone from the Heritage Foundation told you that if an outlet is publishing a story that is accurate and newsworthy, then they don't have to worry about being sued. Really, the case that you're making is that that's not enough.

How is that not enough, especially in a world where we really can't agree on what is accurate or newsworthy?

How is that not enough, especially in a world where we really can't agree on what is accurate or newsworthy?