Tate Brown

Yeah, whites, it was like... I think it was like 58-42 for Trump.

So, yeah.

I mean, it's... But if you like, again...

It's a difficult thing because it's just like at a certain point, the problem more so is like a procedural issue.

It's like if we keep voting for the less immigration party and then we get more immigration, then at a certain point, you have to question the entire system at large.

Is democracy capable of delivering a result that would hurt the stock market?

That's basically the question at play, and the answer is probably no.

like the market comes first no matter what, the GDP must go up.

And migration up until like literally five minutes ago was kind of a cheat code for the GDP because you just brought in like excess spenders, people that were gonna like spend money, consume money.

And now that's starting to like

And now some of these governments like in Denmark are starting to react accordingly.

And they're saying, OK, this is just stupid.

And they can literally people leave when you like eliminate a lot of these economic incentives because the majority of people aren't like noble conquistadors.

They're literally just leeches.

And like you eliminate again, if you eliminate the sort of the food supply, so to speak, they just go home.

And if you distill the white population for groups that would be considered kind of the heritage American population, it's an even much higher proportion that's voting Republican.

Of course.

The group in the United States that votes the most Republican is English Americans, and that's...

would be considered kind of the core group.

So the further out you get from that Anglo-Protestant core of the United States, as Warren McIntyre would put it, the more unlikely you are to see voting patterns that would indicate protecting the border, implementing Christian values in society and these sorts of things.