Terrence Howard

King.

Thank you for appreciating that.

The addition is subtraction and division is all right.

The only problems I have is you can't divide by zero, right?

but you can multiply by zero.

And if division is the inverse operation of multiplication, then you should be able to divide by it.

But if you divide by zero, you end up with an infinity.

And there was a great system put together by Marco Rodin, the vortexual-based math system, where they removed the zero, but it's able to predict...

all the things necessary.

It was 100% precise as a model, but it's been abandoned or it's been relegated to the outskirts.

Multiplication should initially started as exaggerated addition.

That was the whole point of it.

And that's the problems with the identity principle that they've been trying to work on for years.

For years.

Norman J. Wildberger talks about it.

It is what's... Because you have to cancel conservation of energy and you have to cancel the action and reactionary laws in order for one times one.

Now, I understand.

You're seeing one, one time.

But because of the associative law, the associative law that says if A and B are both positive integers, then A is to be added to itself in multiplication.

A is to be added to itself as many units as is indicated by B. Hang on there.