Tevi Troy

Trump tapped Russell Vogt, an architect of Project 2025, to lead his budget office and soon unleashed a flurry of orders reshaping the government, many of which were outlined in Project 2025, from immigration enforcement to dismantling the Department of Education.

Presidential historian Tevi Troy sees little difference between what the Heritage Foundation did with Project 2025 and

What think tanks on the left and right have always done, compiling policy proposals for incoming presidents.

I would say that Project 2025 was largely standard conservative fare, but with a bit more of a MAGA flavor than previously.

Troy says Trump may have attracted scrutiny by trying to distance himself from Project 2025.

Franco Ordonez, NPR News.

When a press secretary who usually speaks off the cuff reads a very carefully written statement, it usually suggests that the lawyers were involved.

When a press secretary who usually speaks off the cuff reads a very carefully written statement, it usually suggests that the lawyers were involved.

Ben, thanks. And thanks for reading my book.

Ben, thanks. And thanks for reading my book.

Ben, thanks. And thanks for reading my book.

Yeah, Ben, that is exactly right. And I always get nervous when I hear the phrase unilaterally set prices, because that's government setting prices rather than the market setting prices. And as you know well, the market is the best mechanism for setting prices. But you're right.

Yeah, Ben, that is exactly right. And I always get nervous when I hear the phrase unilaterally set prices, because that's government setting prices rather than the market setting prices. And as you know well, the market is the best mechanism for setting prices. But you're right.

Yeah, Ben, that is exactly right. And I always get nervous when I hear the phrase unilaterally set prices, because that's government setting prices rather than the market setting prices. And as you know well, the market is the best mechanism for setting prices. But you're right.

The Europeans artificially push down American prices because they don't want to pay their full share for pharmaceutical products. And that does leave American consumers spitting the bill. imposing price controls here doesn't solve the problem.

The Europeans artificially push down American prices because they don't want to pay their full share for pharmaceutical products. And that does leave American consumers spitting the bill. imposing price controls here doesn't solve the problem.

The Europeans artificially push down American prices because they don't want to pay their full share for pharmaceutical products. And that does leave American consumers spitting the bill. imposing price controls here doesn't solve the problem.

What we should do is, yes, encourage the European countries to pay their fair share, but also we should do FDA regulatory reform so it doesn't cost over $3 billion to do a new drug. We also need to do tort reform. The trial lawyers extort hundreds of billions of dollars from these pharmaceutical companies, and that gets priced into the products.

What we should do is, yes, encourage the European countries to pay their fair share, but also we should do FDA regulatory reform so it doesn't cost over $3 billion to do a new drug. We also need to do tort reform. The trial lawyers extort hundreds of billions of dollars from these pharmaceutical companies, and that gets priced into the products.

What we should do is, yes, encourage the European countries to pay their fair share, but also we should do FDA regulatory reform so it doesn't cost over $3 billion to do a new drug. We also need to do tort reform. The trial lawyers extort hundreds of billions of dollars from these pharmaceutical companies, and that gets priced into the products.