Tim Burchett

And what they tried to do is the landlord of the venue where these two events were being held is a Canadian government office, right? And so what they tried to do is they didn't want Rumble and all these nasty conservatives coming in there. And Donald Trump Jr. was a featured guest at these two different live events, by the way.

And what they tried to do is the landlord of the venue where these two events were being held is a Canadian government office, right? And so what they tried to do is they didn't want Rumble and all these nasty conservatives coming in there. And Donald Trump Jr. was a featured guest at these two different live events, by the way.

And what they tried to do is the landlord of the venue where these two events were being held is a Canadian government office, right? And so what they tried to do is they didn't want Rumble and all these nasty conservatives coming in there. And Donald Trump Jr. was a featured guest at these two different live events, by the way.

And we have internal communications of the government officials talking about what are they going to do to try to block these events from happening in advance. They talked about. oh, this is going to draw an undesirable crowd. They didn't like the people.

And we have internal communications of the government officials talking about what are they going to do to try to block these events from happening in advance. They talked about. oh, this is going to draw an undesirable crowd. They didn't like the people.

And we have internal communications of the government officials talking about what are they going to do to try to block these events from happening in advance. They talked about. oh, this is going to draw an undesirable crowd. They didn't like the people.

Then they went to the police and said, is there any way that we can present this as going to be a security threat and that there might be violence or an uprising of some kind? And the local police said, no. No, we have no reports of that. There's nothing we can tell you about that.

Then they went to the police and said, is there any way that we can present this as going to be a security threat and that there might be violence or an uprising of some kind? And the local police said, no. No, we have no reports of that. There's nothing we can tell you about that.

Then they went to the police and said, is there any way that we can present this as going to be a security threat and that there might be violence or an uprising of some kind? And the local police said, no. No, we have no reports of that. There's nothing we can tell you about that.

And so what they did was they artificially drove up the costs of security because they hoped that Rumble and Rebel News would just say, oh, that's too expensive. So they charged them these exorbitant security costs in order, they said, to provide security for the thing in an attempt to scuttle the whole deal. When in fact, the member of parliament, her name is Yara Sachs,

And so what they did was they artificially drove up the costs of security because they hoped that Rumble and Rebel News would just say, oh, that's too expensive. So they charged them these exorbitant security costs in order, they said, to provide security for the thing in an attempt to scuttle the whole deal. When in fact, the member of parliament, her name is Yara Sachs,

And so what they did was they artificially drove up the costs of security because they hoped that Rumble and Rebel News would just say, oh, that's too expensive. So they charged them these exorbitant security costs in order, they said, to provide security for the thing in an attempt to scuttle the whole deal. When in fact, the member of parliament, her name is Yara Sachs,

She posted on X in public that she didn't like Rebel News because Rebel News had been in communication with her opponent in the upcoming election. So it was clearly viewpoint discrimination. It was clearly discriminating against people because of their political views. She didn't want her political opponent being involved in this public thing. They tried to shut it down by hiking security fees.

She posted on X in public that she didn't like Rebel News because Rebel News had been in communication with her opponent in the upcoming election. So it was clearly viewpoint discrimination. It was clearly discriminating against people because of their political views. She didn't want her political opponent being involved in this public thing. They tried to shut it down by hiking security fees.

She posted on X in public that she didn't like Rebel News because Rebel News had been in communication with her opponent in the upcoming election. So it was clearly viewpoint discrimination. It was clearly discriminating against people because of their political views. She didn't want her political opponent being involved in this public thing. They tried to shut it down by hiking security fees.

Well, the joke was on them. They paid the security fees. The events went off without a hitch. Guess what? There was no violence. Nothing happened. Everything was fine. But now they find themselves in court and they're facing being accused of attempts to violate the freedom of expression, freedom of speech, which Canadian citizens have the right to express. And that's Rumble.

Well, the joke was on them. They paid the security fees. The events went off without a hitch. Guess what? There was no violence. Nothing happened. Everything was fine. But now they find themselves in court and they're facing being accused of attempts to violate the freedom of expression, freedom of speech, which Canadian citizens have the right to express. And that's Rumble.

Well, the joke was on them. They paid the security fees. The events went off without a hitch. Guess what? There was no violence. Nothing happened. Everything was fine. But now they find themselves in court and they're facing being accused of attempts to violate the freedom of expression, freedom of speech, which Canadian citizens have the right to express. And that's Rumble.

This is not the only time and it's not the only venue in which Rumble is once again on the front lines of fighting for free speech. You know, they're at it in Brazil fighting against the Supreme Court judge there. They've taken on China, speaking of China again, Russia, and even countries that you wouldn't expect, Australia, New Zealand, France, all of them coming saying, censor these channels.

This is not the only time and it's not the only venue in which Rumble is once again on the front lines of fighting for free speech. You know, they're at it in Brazil fighting against the Supreme Court judge there. They've taken on China, speaking of China again, Russia, and even countries that you wouldn't expect, Australia, New Zealand, France, all of them coming saying, censor these channels.