Tim Miller

That's something I really agree with you on.

But let's say that that person, whoever it is, has said and done the right things on GAAS and has presented themselves in a way that people will leave them, that that is an authentic view.

And then they say, I'm going to get in there in 2029.

But what I'm going to do is instead of fixing the healthcare system or dealing with inflation or dealing with your...

needs.

What I really want to spend my first year on is we're going to do fundamental structural democratic change.

We're going to expand the Supreme Court.

We're going to empower Congress.

I expand the House.

We're going to do all these different things.

I think most people will just be like... I think that that's really challenging.

Somebody has to really get in there and say, I'm going to eat this one because people are going to feel like I'm out of touch and this is some...

you know, concern of the elite, right?

And so I think that's where I get kind of pessimistic.

Rhodes and I talked about this last time that he was on.

And I think he's, he's really good on this, which is you can simultaneously be able to talk about the way that

our role in the world has been pernicious to a certain extent and that we need to redeem ourselves and reconsider exactly what our engagement is in other parts of the world.

That doesn't mean we completely retreat, but like reconsider that and simultaneously recognize that like there are malign forces out there that would like to take that power and that it could get worse.

And this gets back to my small C, you know, it's like 130.

It's like, is the Chinese run world going to be better?