Tim Walz

We saw in our federal workers, we have, you know, not a lot. We're a giver state, not a taker state. But we've got, you know, thousands of federal workers. And then today, I've got the analysis of what the Medicaid reductions would look like.

And I think you need to tell them.

And I think you need to tell them.

And I think you need to tell them.

What do they look like? Well, I'll just take an example. He's a leader, Tom Emmer, you know, number three over there in the house or number two wherever he's at. He's got 124,000 Medicaid recipients. 21,000 of them will be cut off. Those are things that are real to people. So I think getting these numbers, articulating where it's at, and then saying what we would do differently.

What do they look like? Well, I'll just take an example. He's a leader, Tom Emmer, you know, number three over there in the house or number two wherever he's at. He's got 124,000 Medicaid recipients. 21,000 of them will be cut off. Those are things that are real to people. So I think getting these numbers, articulating where it's at, and then saying what we would do differently.

What do they look like? Well, I'll just take an example. He's a leader, Tom Emmer, you know, number three over there in the house or number two wherever he's at. He's got 124,000 Medicaid recipients. 21,000 of them will be cut off. Those are things that are real to people. So I think getting these numbers, articulating where it's at, and then saying what we would do differently.

I think that's been the gap in this, to be honest with you, David. I don't think we have done a good enough job. We tried it on the trail, but I, you know, opportunity economy, that doesn't really fall where you at. You've got to be specific with people. Having Medicare pay for in-home health care for our seniors. I got it right now. I got a mother-in-law just had a surgery for a brain tumor.

I think that's been the gap in this, to be honest with you, David. I don't think we have done a good enough job. We tried it on the trail, but I, you know, opportunity economy, that doesn't really fall where you at. You've got to be specific with people. Having Medicare pay for in-home health care for our seniors. I got it right now. I got a mother-in-law just had a surgery for a brain tumor.

I think that's been the gap in this, to be honest with you, David. I don't think we have done a good enough job. We tried it on the trail, but I, you know, opportunity economy, that doesn't really fall where you at. You've got to be specific with people. Having Medicare pay for in-home health care for our seniors. I got it right now. I got a mother-in-law just had a surgery for a brain tumor.

She's going to need to go into rehab or whatever. The ability for Medicare to be able to pay for that rehab in her home, rather than that would not only save us money, it would improve quality of life and make a difference. And that was a proposal the vice president put out.

She's going to need to go into rehab or whatever. The ability for Medicare to be able to pay for that rehab in her home, rather than that would not only save us money, it would improve quality of life and make a difference. And that was a proposal the vice president put out.

She's going to need to go into rehab or whatever. The ability for Medicare to be able to pay for that rehab in her home, rather than that would not only save us money, it would improve quality of life and make a difference. And that was a proposal the vice president put out.

The economic situation of men has changed in proportion to women. But I would argue this, just because women are getting rights and moving up in the workplace, that doesn't mean that men don't have that same opportunity, that it's there. I think this idea that when somebody else gains a freedom, you lose one, or somebody else gains an opportunity, look, they do whatever they do.

The economic situation of men has changed in proportion to women. But I would argue this, just because women are getting rights and moving up in the workplace, that doesn't mean that men don't have that same opportunity, that it's there. I think this idea that when somebody else gains a freedom, you lose one, or somebody else gains an opportunity, look, they do whatever they do.

The economic situation of men has changed in proportion to women. But I would argue this, just because women are getting rights and moving up in the workplace, that doesn't mean that men don't have that same opportunity, that it's there. I think this idea that when somebody else gains a freedom, you lose one, or somebody else gains an opportunity, look, they do whatever they do.

I have lived straight up the middle of this. I know football. I hunt. You know what they do? They take time to demonize my military career. Say he's not a real coach. He was the defensive coordinator. He doesn't really know how to hunt because, you know, I say so or whatever.

I have lived straight up the middle of this. I know football. I hunt. You know what they do? They take time to demonize my military career. Say he's not a real coach. He was the defensive coordinator. He doesn't really know how to hunt because, you know, I say so or whatever.

I have lived straight up the middle of this. I know football. I hunt. You know what they do? They take time to demonize my military career. Say he's not a real coach. He was the defensive coordinator. He doesn't really know how to hunt because, you know, I say so or whatever.

So anything that was, if that's what defined, and I would say it doesn't, if that was to define masculinity, to know football, fix your own car, you're in the army for 25 years, they don't care. They demonize that. And they voted for a guy who can't do any of those things. And so I think I disagree with the senator.