Tim

So we have this weak dial-up internet from the old.

Did you guys see the Variety article that was insulting Chuck Norris?

It was titled Chuck Norris, action movie star, but his politics may muddy his legacy or whatever.

And it went viral because people were like, look how they treat Rob Reiner.

Look how they treat Chuck Norris because he was a conservative.

The article was mostly just a fluff piece.

At the very end, it briefly mentions his movies were largely pro-American propaganda.

And that's all it really says.

But the reason they titled it this way is because we're in an age of 50,000 news websites all competing for you to click on them and you have no reason to click on them.

When Chuck Norris died, rest in peace, legend, everyone instantly knew.

You just needed X. You didn't need anything else.

Right.

So how do you function as a news outlet then?

You have to write something people will click on.

But they didn't make that up.

That's actually... Well, it's just great.

But they didn't make it up, so I'm not going to give New York Post credit for saying he's gay.

Everybody was saying... Was he gay?

At the same time.

They were saying he was gay in 1992.