Tina Moore

If you also want to resist aging at the cellular level and stave off those zombie cells, try Qualia Sinalytic. Go to qualialife.com forward slash drtina for up to 50% off and use code drtina at checkout for an additional 15% off. That's Q-U-A-L-I-A life.com forward slash drtina for an extra 15% off your purchase. Thanks to Qualia for sponsoring today's episode. Okay, so let's get back to this.

The expected resting metabolic rate drop would be a normal slowdown due to overall tissue loss, right? They're losing some muscle. They're losing some fat mass. Their body should slow down their resting metabolic rate. Their actual resting metabolic rate is what you can measure, and metabolic adaptation is when the actual is more than what is expected.

The expected resting metabolic rate drop would be a normal slowdown due to overall tissue loss, right? They're losing some muscle. They're losing some fat mass. Their body should slow down their resting metabolic rate. Their actual resting metabolic rate is what you can measure, and metabolic adaptation is when the actual is more than what is expected.

The expected resting metabolic rate drop would be a normal slowdown due to overall tissue loss, right? They're losing some muscle. They're losing some fat mass. Their body should slow down their resting metabolic rate. Their actual resting metabolic rate is what you can measure, and metabolic adaptation is when the actual is more than what is expected.

And in this case, Terzapatide just gave them the actual amount. Let's get back to the summary here. The expected resting metabolic rate drop when people lose weight is due to normal tissue loss. Like you lose an amount of tissue, lean mass, fat mass, you're always going to lose some muscle. That's lean mass. That's part of lean mass, I should say. You get an expected resting metabolic rate drop.

And in this case, Terzapatide just gave them the actual amount. Let's get back to the summary here. The expected resting metabolic rate drop when people lose weight is due to normal tissue loss. Like you lose an amount of tissue, lean mass, fat mass, you're always going to lose some muscle. That's lean mass. That's part of lean mass, I should say. You get an expected resting metabolic rate drop.

And in this case, Terzapatide just gave them the actual amount. Let's get back to the summary here. The expected resting metabolic rate drop when people lose weight is due to normal tissue loss. Like you lose an amount of tissue, lean mass, fat mass, you're always going to lose some muscle. That's lean mass. That's part of lean mass, I should say. You get an expected resting metabolic rate drop.

The actual resting metabolic rate drop that happens with caloric restriction, unfortunately, that you can measure, it's what you measure, is usually always more than the expected. So in this case, the trisepatite protected them and it just gave them the expected. There was not the fall off cliff. There was not a pronounced extra amount of resting metabolic rate drop. I hope that makes sense.

The actual resting metabolic rate drop that happens with caloric restriction, unfortunately, that you can measure, it's what you measure, is usually always more than the expected. So in this case, the trisepatite protected them and it just gave them the expected. There was not the fall off cliff. There was not a pronounced extra amount of resting metabolic rate drop. I hope that makes sense.

The actual resting metabolic rate drop that happens with caloric restriction, unfortunately, that you can measure, it's what you measure, is usually always more than the expected. So in this case, the trisepatite protected them and it just gave them the expected. There was not the fall off cliff. There was not a pronounced extra amount of resting metabolic rate drop. I hope that makes sense.

I'm trying to explain physiology here. It's metabolically protective. No unnecessary metabolic slowdown. The triseptide users didn't experience the bonus drop in their resting metabolic rate that sabotages most dieters. Resting metabolic rate dropped only as expected, not extra. Based on fat and muscle loss, the bodies behaved predictably, not defensively. They didn't go into starvation mode.

I'm trying to explain physiology here. It's metabolically protective. No unnecessary metabolic slowdown. The triseptide users didn't experience the bonus drop in their resting metabolic rate that sabotages most dieters. Resting metabolic rate dropped only as expected, not extra. Based on fat and muscle loss, the bodies behaved predictably, not defensively. They didn't go into starvation mode.

I'm trying to explain physiology here. It's metabolically protective. No unnecessary metabolic slowdown. The triseptide users didn't experience the bonus drop in their resting metabolic rate that sabotages most dieters. Resting metabolic rate dropped only as expected, not extra. Based on fat and muscle loss, the bodies behaved predictably, not defensively. They didn't go into starvation mode.

That's a win. Muscle mass, fat-free mass was reasonably preserved. How's this for you? About 75% to 80% of their weight loss was fat, which is better than diet-induced losses. Most diet-induced losses are anywhere between 25% and 40%, and I know we hear the stories. Everybody loves to lean on that 40% because of one study that happened years ago. Oh, they lost 40% of their lean mass.

That's a win. Muscle mass, fat-free mass was reasonably preserved. How's this for you? About 75% to 80% of their weight loss was fat, which is better than diet-induced losses. Most diet-induced losses are anywhere between 25% and 40%, and I know we hear the stories. Everybody loves to lean on that 40% because of one study that happened years ago. Oh, they lost 40% of their lean mass.

That's a win. Muscle mass, fat-free mass was reasonably preserved. How's this for you? About 75% to 80% of their weight loss was fat, which is better than diet-induced losses. Most diet-induced losses are anywhere between 25% and 40%, and I know we hear the stories. Everybody loves to lean on that 40% because of one study that happened years ago. Oh, they lost 40% of their lean mass.

Only a portion of lean mass loss is muscle, FYI, and fat. Some of it's the fatty infiltrate inside the muscle that they're not even accounting for. But some of these big name health influencers and doctors really love to lean on that 40%.

Only a portion of lean mass loss is muscle, FYI, and fat. Some of it's the fatty infiltrate inside the muscle that they're not even accounting for. But some of these big name health influencers and doctors really love to lean on that 40%.

Only a portion of lean mass loss is muscle, FYI, and fat. Some of it's the fatty infiltrate inside the muscle that they're not even accounting for. But some of these big name health influencers and doctors really love to lean on that 40%.

But when you get into the studies where they had people exercising or they had people take care to pay attention to their protein macros or even just gave them high doses of triseptide and let them go like it looked like they did in this one. they actually had a significantly lower lean mass loss than we've seen in some of those other studies. So don't let people scare you on the internet.