Tiziana Scalabrine

Sabalenka goes to serve, plays an ace and two consecutive winning services.

It's a mess.

It's a mess.

Yes, and when Sabalenka went on, 3-0 in the third set, Vukov told him, you have to put more energy.

Crazy.

Yes, maybe Sabalenka has some things to improve.

Staying on Sabalenka, in my opinion this is one of the cases, perhaps the important defeat of his career, in which in proportion he has less to reproach, because he played three sets in crescendo, which is difficult to do in a final.

One point that may have been wrong is that she was able to cancel

one of the balls of the counter-break and on the second he made a mistake on a ball that could have closed instead he pulled the net.

But for the type of game that this Balenka does, these are errors that you absolutely have to take into account.

You can't think that this Balenka is never wrong.

Having played in crescendo and having served very well, it was with the service at the height of the best server on the circuit,

and they also played a great match, both in response.

In everything, yes.

She played this and she won.

What you say is very true.

Let's say that other players, maybe this is a description a little bit at the limit, but Goff and Keyes have to exasperate Sabalenka to make her grant something.

and instead really Rybakina is the one who can beat the number one to their 100% and in fact you were telling him about his problem so much of constancy because it is linked to how much his physique holds within a season and also within the game itself because just when the games lengthen like the one you named Roland Garros with Spiontek but also in this in reality it is a game that came from the third set

Something in her, however, slowly crumbles, the power of her blows, if you go to see at a certain point there were the data on the speed of the straight, that of Sabalenka was little, but always a little faster than 7 in 7, that of Rybakina fell 7 in 7.

So she, this thing of expressing herself best over distance, is probably something that she might be able to acquire, but she still doesn't have it.