Todd Blanch

They applied for asylum.

And yes, the judge disagreed with us that...

Well, so that's not true.

That is not true.

There's a very meaningful dispute about whether they had properly applied for asylum.

And again, I cannot get into the specifics of this litigation, but you can read the same briefs I can and what you just said is not true.

The victims want to be made whole, and so we want that.

The Attorney General wants that more than anything, but that doesn't mean we can just create evidence or that we can just kind of come up with a case that isn't there.

The victims want to be made whole, and so we want that.

The Attorney General wants that more than anything, but that doesn't mean we can just create evidence or that we can just kind of come up with a case that isn't there.

So look, it's not about President Trump.

It's about a ton of people, multiple, multiple, multiple people that were, quote, in the Epstein files.

And what I think folks will see when they review the materials we released is that there have been hundreds of people

calls made to the FBI where allegations are made by either anonymous individuals or people who are very quickly determined to not be credible, whether it's the nature of what they're saying or the fact they won't provide any information or corroboration.

And that's part of the Epstein files.

So go ahead.

Yes, of course.

But no, but what you're not being fair in that question, because that that that index, that list you're talking about was not just President Trump.

It was all kinds of individuals, other politicians, other, quote, famous people where where we wanted to understand, OK, there were members of Congress that were accusing us of hiding things.

which we're not doing and which we haven't done.