Tom Bilyeu

And as I think about AI and the way it pulls images forth out of the possibility space, it does it in a certain way.

And you can create different kinds of AI that do it in slightly different ways and they yield different outcomes.

And so for the headset that we all experience to be the way that it is, it requires consciousness to be a certain way.

And so what I'm trying to get to is when there is no physicality, how does it ever become a certain way?

Because the way that consciousness could act would have to pull from a probability space.

But if I'm right about that, then math comes before consciousness.

And if I'm wrong about that, I don't understand what sets consciousness moving in a specific direction.

Because if there's an infinite number of potential headsets, how would you begin to narrow it down to the headset we actually have?

In other words- Why would they need to look like neurons and brains?

Yeah, but pulling from our earlier interviews, and so we definitely haven't talked about it this time, and maybe your thinking has changed or maybe I misunderstood your thinking previously, but it was my understanding.

I think I was asking you specifically about the moon.

And I was like, but there's gravitational concerns.

It can't not represent something underlying.

And you said, Tom, you're, you're making a mistake.

This is all a simulation.

Gravity is a simulation.

The moon is a simulation.

You don't need the moon there to simulate gravity, to move tides or whatever.

They can just be program rules.

And that's just how it happens.