Tom Garratt

Chelsea would play a bank of four.

The problem is that's kind of like an unfair argument because you're comparing how John Terry would play in a specific task yourself.

That's the conversation.

No, let me finish.

But that's not how you compare...

who the better player is.

Because if you had Terry on your team, you might play a different set-up in a team.

If you were to play Terry in this day and age, as a manager, you wouldn't put him in positions where he's left in those.

You play to his strengths, so you wouldn't play a highlight.

I'm moving it away from that.

It's not just about...

not just about only if you had terry you're on about we could terry play in this modern day and age you wouldn't play it doesn't have to be a liverpool high line i understand that's your question but i'm coming back soon it doesn't happen yeah but you wouldn't leave him stranded by himself if you that's my point even so you've answered the question he can't play anything but that doesn't mean he can't play at the level though you play to his strengths he's not saying that he's not saying that you're so he's saying he couldn't play in a high line

I'm moving the debate to a different point.

They're still in the trouble.

We live in an age where Harry Maguire's had a very successful career.

And he got torn apart when he went to Man United with a high line.

Yeah, no, but John Terry's like a triple the defender that Maguire is.

Maguire's still had a very successful career.

Yes, I'm talking about a player who has the similar physical attributes, but one's way better.

I'm using an example of someone who has the same lack of pace, but Terry's tripled the player.