Tovia Smith
👤 SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
The Trump administration had asked the court to block a lower court order forcing the government to fully fund SNAP benefits, saying that was not the judiciary's call.
The administration pressed the case, even as it acknowledged that the deal now advancing to end the shutdown would restore full funding.
One lawyer for the administration told a lower court that would happen as soon as 24 hours later.
The Supreme Court did not speak to the merits of the case, but in a three-sentence order, it did note that Justice Katonji Brown Jackson, who allowed a previous pause while the case was on appeal, would not have allowed the Trump administration to continue avoiding false SNAP payments.
The Trump administration had asked the court to block a lower court order forcing the government to fully fund SNAP benefits, saying that was not the judiciary's call.
The administration pressed the case, even as it acknowledged that the deal now advancing to end the shutdown would restore full funding.
One lawyer for the administration told a lower court that would happen as soon as 24 hours later.
The Supreme Court did not speak to the merits of the case, but in a three-sentence order, it did note that Justice Katonji Brown Jackson, who allowed a previous pause while the case was on appeal, would not have allowed the Trump administration to continue avoiding false SNAP payments.
The Trump administration's bid for help from the Supreme Court comes after a federal appeals court last night refused a similar request.
At issue is an order from a federal judge in Rhode Island requiring payment of full SNAP benefits instead of the 65% the administration wants to pay.
Meantime, a group of states who already paid some full benefits got a federal judge in Boston to temporarily stop the Trump administration from penalizing them.
Administration officials say those states may have to pay the government back for any payments over 65 percent and they could lose some federal funding.
The states insist they were in compliance with administrative guidance and court orders when making those payments.
A deal to reopen the government could get full payments flowing almost as quickly, but the SNAP lapse may have longer-term ramifications.
Food pantries say they expect high demand to continue as many SNAP recipients need to restock their cupboards, and some food banks say they expect to be short on stocks since some large food orders they usually get from the government were not processed during the shutdown.
A federal appeals court at midnight last night refused a Trump administration request to pause a lower court ruling, which means officials now have two days to pay SNAP benefits at 100 percent, not 65 percent, though they could take the case to the Supreme Court for the second time in a few days.