Tracy Alloway

The concern is that they do have this sort of memory type transfer mechanism.

And that if you consistently treat them badly, you might get an agent that's maybe like not as well suited to the task or suited to the task in a slightly different way from one that was treated very well.

Like there's an inherent bias there.

Yeah.

That's very strange.

You know, you very briefly mentioned mythos earlier in the conversation.

And again, we are recording this on April 9th.

And news about it has just literally just come out.

We don't really seem to know much about it other than it's terrified its own creators, perhaps.

When you see those types of headlines, what do you think as an economist studying AI?

Can I just say all of our conversations have become so surreal over the past year or two when we talk about this.

Also, it's nice to see nuance around the labor discussion, which I think is sorely missing in some of the headlines that you do see.

The other one comforting thought I have, but it's like comforting from, again, a dystopian perspective is I keep coming back to that book, Jobs.

And, you know, in some respects, it sucks that people have bull jobs because we all want to have meaning from our work.

But on the other hand, you know, bull jobs have existed for a long time.

And if you think about the AI future, then maybe like more of it will be bullshit, but it'll still be a job.

I think that's where we're sort of heading.

It's like the relationship building.

All of that.

All right.