Tracy Mumford

Also, states with cold weather, where people want to pack inside in the winter and cross their fingers for a rack of ribs. Some churches and kids' sports teams rely on them as fundraisers. Organizers say they can raise $5,000 to even $15,000 a night, depending on the turnout. One woman who runs meat raffles in western New York says they've really taken off. She now runs 100 of them a year.

Also, states with cold weather, where people want to pack inside in the winter and cross their fingers for a rack of ribs. Some churches and kids' sports teams rely on them as fundraisers. Organizers say they can raise $5,000 to even $15,000 a night, depending on the turnout. One woman who runs meat raffles in western New York says they've really taken off. She now runs 100 of them a year.

Also, states with cold weather, where people want to pack inside in the winter and cross their fingers for a rack of ribs. Some churches and kids' sports teams rely on them as fundraisers. Organizers say they can raise $5,000 to even $15,000 a night, depending on the turnout. One woman who runs meat raffles in western New York says they've really taken off. She now runs 100 of them a year.

For some, the appeal is obvious. A snowplow operator who went to a raffle at a VFW in a suburb of Buffalo told the Times, You can win meat. You don't have to go to the grocery store. How can you go wrong with that? Those are the headlines today on The Daily. An interview with one of President Trump's key economic advisors on how he thinks tariffs can change America's relationship with China.

For some, the appeal is obvious. A snowplow operator who went to a raffle at a VFW in a suburb of Buffalo told the Times, You can win meat. You don't have to go to the grocery store. How can you go wrong with that? Those are the headlines today on The Daily. An interview with one of President Trump's key economic advisors on how he thinks tariffs can change America's relationship with China.

For some, the appeal is obvious. A snowplow operator who went to a raffle at a VFW in a suburb of Buffalo told the Times, You can win meat. You don't have to go to the grocery store. How can you go wrong with that? Those are the headlines today on The Daily. An interview with one of President Trump's key economic advisors on how he thinks tariffs can change America's relationship with China.

That's next in The New York Times audio app, or you can listen wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow.

That's next in The New York Times audio app, or you can listen wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow.

That's next in The New York Times audio app, or you can listen wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow.

From The New York Times, it's The Headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Tuesday, February 11th. Here's what we're covering. The Trump administration and the courts have moved one step closer to a major showdown. On Monday, a federal judge said for the first time that the White House is defying a clear and unambiguous judicial order.

From The New York Times, it's The Headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Tuesday, February 11th. Here's what we're covering. The Trump administration and the courts have moved one step closer to a major showdown. On Monday, a federal judge said for the first time that the White House is defying a clear and unambiguous judicial order.

From The New York Times, it's The Headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Tuesday, February 11th. Here's what we're covering. The Trump administration and the courts have moved one step closer to a major showdown. On Monday, a federal judge said for the first time that the White House is defying a clear and unambiguous judicial order.

The legal fight is over the billions of dollars in federal funding that the administration froze last month so they could root out any programs they felt weren't in line with President Trump's ideology and agenda. The judge had ordered the administration to keep the money flowing, but they have not fully complied, and there are reports that they've frozen even more money since then.

The legal fight is over the billions of dollars in federal funding that the administration froze last month so they could root out any programs they felt weren't in line with President Trump's ideology and agenda. The judge had ordered the administration to keep the money flowing, but they have not fully complied, and there are reports that they've frozen even more money since then.

The legal fight is over the billions of dollars in federal funding that the administration froze last month so they could root out any programs they felt weren't in line with President Trump's ideology and agenda. The judge had ordered the administration to keep the money flowing, but they have not fully complied, and there are reports that they've frozen even more money since then.

The judge said yesterday that there is no legitimate reason for the White House not to be following his orders. In a statement, though, a White House spokesman was openly defiant, claiming that, quote, every action of the Trump-Vance administration is completely lawful and that any challenge against it is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people.

The judge said yesterday that there is no legitimate reason for the White House not to be following his orders. In a statement, though, a White House spokesman was openly defiant, claiming that, quote, every action of the Trump-Vance administration is completely lawful and that any challenge against it is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people.

The judge said yesterday that there is no legitimate reason for the White House not to be following his orders. In a statement, though, a White House spokesman was openly defiant, claiming that, quote, every action of the Trump-Vance administration is completely lawful and that any challenge against it is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people.

The administration's refusal to release federal funds might not be the only court order they're ignoring. Yesterday, a federal workers' group said the administration is still putting USAID employees on leave, even after a judge told them to stop.

The administration's refusal to release federal funds might not be the only court order they're ignoring. Yesterday, a federal workers' group said the administration is still putting USAID employees on leave, even after a judge told them to stop.