Tracy Smith

Not reasonable. And why would Suzanne have a scarf around her neck that early in the morning to begin with? Prosecutors suggested that Scott Sills used it to strangle her and then left it around her neck to cover the marks. But Early told the jury it wasn't unusual for Suzanne to wear a scarf, especially when she wasn't feeling well.

Not reasonable. And why would Suzanne have a scarf around her neck that early in the morning to begin with? Prosecutors suggested that Scott Sills used it to strangle her and then left it around her neck to cover the marks. But Early told the jury it wasn't unusual for Suzanne to wear a scarf, especially when she wasn't feeling well.

But the prosecution also pointed out that Suzanne and Scott's son, Eric, told investigators he saw his mother put the dogs away in their crate in the hours before she died. Eric said that his mom put the dogs in the crate.

But the prosecution also pointed out that Suzanne and Scott's son, Eric, told investigators he saw his mother put the dogs away in their crate in the hours before she died. Eric said that his mom put the dogs in the crate.

But the prosecution also pointed out that Suzanne and Scott's son, Eric, told investigators he saw his mother put the dogs away in their crate in the hours before she died. Eric said that his mom put the dogs in the crate.

There was also no blood on the stairs or damage to them. There are all these injuries that you say come from the fall down the stairs all over her body, but she leaves no marks on the stairs. But there's no marks anywhere in the house. But there was that blood in Mary Catherine's bedroom, and the prosecution argued it was evidence that a fight occurred.

There was also no blood on the stairs or damage to them. There are all these injuries that you say come from the fall down the stairs all over her body, but she leaves no marks on the stairs. But there's no marks anywhere in the house. But there was that blood in Mary Catherine's bedroom, and the prosecution argued it was evidence that a fight occurred.

There was also no blood on the stairs or damage to them. There are all these injuries that you say come from the fall down the stairs all over her body, but she leaves no marks on the stairs. But there's no marks anywhere in the house. But there was that blood in Mary Catherine's bedroom, and the prosecution argued it was evidence that a fight occurred.

A forensic scientist testified that the stains on the nightstand and drapes were consistent with Scott Sills' DNA. Early did acknowledge that his client's blood was in the room, but he told the jury about Scott's claim that he hurt himself there on an earlier date. From Scott replacing a screen?

A forensic scientist testified that the stains on the nightstand and drapes were consistent with Scott Sills' DNA. Early did acknowledge that his client's blood was in the room, but he told the jury about Scott's claim that he hurt himself there on an earlier date. From Scott replacing a screen?

A forensic scientist testified that the stains on the nightstand and drapes were consistent with Scott Sills' DNA. Early did acknowledge that his client's blood was in the room, but he told the jury about Scott's claim that he hurt himself there on an earlier date. From Scott replacing a screen?

That forensic scientist, though, testified that one of the stains on the wall was a mixture of DNA — And Scott and Suzanne were likely contributors. Early says that doesn't mean it was Suzanne's blood and that it could have been her touch DNA that was picked up.

That forensic scientist, though, testified that one of the stains on the wall was a mixture of DNA — And Scott and Suzanne were likely contributors. Early says that doesn't mean it was Suzanne's blood and that it could have been her touch DNA that was picked up.

That forensic scientist, though, testified that one of the stains on the wall was a mixture of DNA — And Scott and Suzanne were likely contributors. Early says that doesn't mean it was Suzanne's blood and that it could have been her touch DNA that was picked up.

But the prosecution pointed out that there were also clumps of Suzanne's hair found in Mary Catherine's room. And there were bloodstains on Suzanne's clothing that were found to be consistent with Scott Sills' DNA, too. Early had a rebuttal to it all, starting with the hair.

But the prosecution pointed out that there were also clumps of Suzanne's hair found in Mary Catherine's room. And there were bloodstains on Suzanne's clothing that were found to be consistent with Scott Sills' DNA, too. Early had a rebuttal to it all, starting with the hair.

But the prosecution pointed out that there were also clumps of Suzanne's hair found in Mary Catherine's room. And there were bloodstains on Suzanne's clothing that were found to be consistent with Scott Sills' DNA, too. Early had a rebuttal to it all, starting with the hair.

And the blood on the clothes?

And the blood on the clothes?

And the blood on the clothes?