Trevor Collins

Gotta make it.

Right.

It's just safety.

This thing can take it all.

But yeah, I mean, it really could be the hubris.

You asked about why didn't they just anchor early on?

Another part is it's part of the job.

You know, you got a job.

I hate that.

I hate that.

That that's a thing.

That money is a motivating and driving factor.

But

reality is reality and it is part of the equation and so if a company is in scrupulous enough to want to overload it just enough that it could well we'll roll the dice yeah and then they get unlucky with a terrible terrible storm so taking this into account the the sitting lower in the water and three feet three inches is not a little bit that's a decent amount

This theory states that the water had most likely then been filling into the cargo hold and into the ballast tanks at the front of the ship.

This could have been happening earlier and maybe that's why it's sinking lower.

That part's a little unclear to me.

So it's either two things.

I want to be very transparent.

It could be that the ship is overloaded or some people have surmised that maybe it had taken on water, which is why it was sat a little low.