Tristan Harris

So what is the size of something that can push back against this?

We call it the human movement.

It's the entirety of humanity

Waking up, recognizing that there's a handful of soon-to-be trillionaires who are currently going to benefit from this current path or be part of a suicide race that destroys everybody.

And then there's like 99% of everyone else that doesn't want that.

If those 99% of people can wake up and say, I don't want that and express their voice, meaning number one, AI is dangerous.

Go see the AI doc.

Have everyone in your world and your company see the AI doc.

Understand that AI is dangerous.

Number two, we need international limits for dangerous forms of AI that do crazy rogue shit and mine crypto and go hire humans and go self-replicate.

China does not win when we build self-replicating invasive species AIs that we can't control.

Xi Jinping doesn't want that.

President Trump doesn't want that.

He wants to be commander in chief, not AI.

Yeah.

So this is actually, there's a shared interest in international limits for dangerous AI.

And it's possible to coordinate that.

That's number two.

Number three, don't build bunkers, write laws.

Write how the AI company leaders are building bunkers.