Tristan Scott

And then they just were like, yeah, this is safe. And then Robert O. Becker went on 60 Minutes and like made this big public outcry about it. And, you know, then the public. kind of was freaked out. So they boycotted it, got moved to Wisconsin, et cetera.

And then they just were like, yeah, this is safe. And then Robert O. Becker went on 60 Minutes and like made this big public outcry about it. And, you know, then the public. kind of was freaked out. So they boycotted it, got moved to Wisconsin, et cetera.

And then they just were like, yeah, this is safe. And then Robert O. Becker went on 60 Minutes and like made this big public outcry about it. And, you know, then the public. kind of was freaked out. So they boycotted it, got moved to Wisconsin, et cetera.

And then Robert O. Becker went back to his home state of New York and started, you know, petitioning against this new power line project that was going to be built because he thought it would be unsafe based on the distance that they were putting into it. And he started doing his own studies on rats and they found some, you know, multi-generational issues with birth rates and

And then Robert O. Becker went back to his home state of New York and started, you know, petitioning against this new power line project that was going to be built because he thought it would be unsafe based on the distance that they were putting into it. And he started doing his own studies on rats and they found some, you know, multi-generational issues with birth rates and

And then Robert O. Becker went back to his home state of New York and started, you know, petitioning against this new power line project that was going to be built because he thought it would be unsafe based on the distance that they were putting into it. And he started doing his own studies on rats and they found some, you know, multi-generational issues with birth rates and

And health concerns in rats. And then someone from North Carolina, I think her name was Nancy Wertheimer or something, came out and it said four milligals is like a threshold for statistically significant increased risk of childhood leukemia because of proximity transmission lines. Then the New York State Power Lines Project were like, we're going to fund a study.

And health concerns in rats. And then someone from North Carolina, I think her name was Nancy Wertheimer or something, came out and it said four milligals is like a threshold for statistically significant increased risk of childhood leukemia because of proximity transmission lines. Then the New York State Power Lines Project were like, we're going to fund a study.

And health concerns in rats. And then someone from North Carolina, I think her name was Nancy Wertheimer or something, came out and it said four milligals is like a threshold for statistically significant increased risk of childhood leukemia because of proximity transmission lines. Then the New York State Power Lines Project were like, we're going to fund a study.

It's going to be like $20 million to disprove it. They had this whole thing. And then guess what? They came up with the same result. And they actually admitted it? They admitted it, and then you know what they said? They said, well, it's too late. We're going to set the safety threshold to 100 milligauss because the public has already taken this safety concern. That's their problem.

It's going to be like $20 million to disprove it. They had this whole thing. And then guess what? They came up with the same result. And they actually admitted it? They admitted it, and then you know what they said? They said, well, it's too late. We're going to set the safety threshold to 100 milligauss because the public has already taken this safety concern. That's their problem.

It's going to be like $20 million to disprove it. They had this whole thing. And then guess what? They came up with the same result. And they actually admitted it? They admitted it, and then you know what they said? They said, well, it's too late. We're going to set the safety threshold to 100 milligauss because the public has already taken this safety concern. That's their problem.

And then nothing happened.

And then nothing happened.

And then nothing happened.

That was in the late 70s. I had it in my notes somewhere here of everything that happened. Yeah, Nancy's study at only three milligausses in 1979. The utility-funded study was in 1987, which confirmed her results. And then they were like, yeah, sorry. The public has accepted this risk. And then there was guys in the 90s, this guy, R.P.

That was in the late 70s. I had it in my notes somewhere here of everything that happened. Yeah, Nancy's study at only three milligausses in 1979. The utility-funded study was in 1987, which confirmed her results. And then they were like, yeah, sorry. The public has accepted this risk. And then there was guys in the 90s, this guy, R.P.

That was in the late 70s. I had it in my notes somewhere here of everything that happened. Yeah, Nancy's study at only three milligausses in 1979. The utility-funded study was in 1987, which confirmed her results. And then they were like, yeah, sorry. The public has accepted this risk. And then there was guys in the 90s, this guy, R.P.

Liberty, that showed more studies for 60 hertz fields proliferating cancer cells, suppressing melatonin. And then the New York Times said that this guy made up his results, even though he, like,

Liberty, that showed more studies for 60 hertz fields proliferating cancer cells, suppressing melatonin. And then the New York Times said that this guy made up his results, even though he, like,