Tristan Scott

Yeah, and it depends maybe on certain agreements, but for the most part, there's pretty much no say. And that was the most lobbied bill of the time. The wireless industry lobbied like $50 million, and that was back 30 years ago. And nothing has really changed. That's also, coincidentally, the last year that wireless technology safety thresholds and guidelines were updated.

They won the lawsuit. You could look that up.

They won the lawsuit. You could look that up.

They won the lawsuit. You could look that up.

Yeah, look that up.

Yeah, look that up.

Yeah, look that up.

More details. Children's Health Defense sues the FCC, and RFK Jr. was a presiding attorney there. And they won, but nothing's happened. So I'm really excited to, you know, I was talking to the Maha team. I'm like, is he actually, you know, you think he's actually going to do some stuff on EMFs? Because guess what? There's a lot of issues out there.

More details. Children's Health Defense sues the FCC, and RFK Jr. was a presiding attorney there. And they won, but nothing's happened. So I'm really excited to, you know, I was talking to the Maha team. I'm like, is he actually, you know, you think he's actually going to do some stuff on EMFs? Because guess what? There's a lot of issues out there.

More details. Children's Health Defense sues the FCC, and RFK Jr. was a presiding attorney there. And they won, but nothing's happened. So I'm really excited to, you know, I was talking to the Maha team. I'm like, is he actually, you know, you think he's actually going to do some stuff on EMFs? Because guess what? There's a lot of issues out there.

This one's probably the hardest one to tackle from just how... sticky the infrastructure situation is. Oh, it's 2022. You got to type in 2022 at the top, Steve. Oh, no, it's good. You got it. That was the right one. That was it. Okay. Oh, no, it's 2021. The article is just in. Okay. Okay, so this is the article. Scroll down.

This one's probably the hardest one to tackle from just how... sticky the infrastructure situation is. Oh, it's 2022. You got to type in 2022 at the top, Steve. Oh, no, it's good. You got it. That was the right one. That was it. Okay. Oh, no, it's 2021. The article is just in. Okay. Okay, so this is the article. Scroll down.

This one's probably the hardest one to tackle from just how... sticky the infrastructure situation is. Oh, it's 2022. You got to type in 2022 at the top, Steve. Oh, no, it's good. You got it. That was the right one. That was it. Okay. Oh, no, it's 2021. The article is just in. Okay. Okay, so this is the article. Scroll down.

And they made the case summary for children. Challenging the FCC's wireless radiation guidelines on August 31st, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals of the D.C. Circuit published decisions on the historic case.

And they made the case summary for children. Challenging the FCC's wireless radiation guidelines on August 31st, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals of the D.C. Circuit published decisions on the historic case.

And they made the case summary for children. Challenging the FCC's wireless radiation guidelines on August 31st, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals of the D.C. Circuit published decisions on the historic case.

Health Defense, in its landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission, is challenging the FCC's decision to not review its health and safety guidelines regarding 5G and wireless technology.

Health Defense, in its landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission, is challenging the FCC's decision to not review its health and safety guidelines regarding 5G and wireless technology.

Health Defense, in its landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission, is challenging the FCC's decision to not review its health and safety guidelines regarding 5G and wireless technology.

The course decision states that the FCC failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radio frequency radiation and failed to review the extensive evidence