Trooper Yuri Bukenik

Because you were out to, quote, make this cut and dry. Isn't that right?

Because you were out to, quote, make this cut and dry. Isn't that right?

Because you were going to make sure that the case was cut and dry. Those were your words, right? Yes. And Trooper Proctor, it would be far easier, far easier for you to pin it on the girl who's just a whack job cunt, in your words, who you hope just kills herself. Right?

Because you were going to make sure that the case was cut and dry. Those were your words, right? Yes. And Trooper Proctor, it would be far easier, far easier for you to pin it on the girl who's just a whack job cunt, in your words, who you hope just kills herself. Right?

Sustained. Shame on you, sir.

Sustained. Shame on you, sir.

Are you saying that the principles of physics are incapable of determining with the proper calculations how far John O'Keefe's body would have moved given the collision at issue?

Are you saying that the principles of physics are incapable of determining with the proper calculations how far John O'Keefe's body would have moved given the collision at issue?

Is it your opinion, based on a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, that those injuries are consistent with an animal attack as opposed to a motor vehicular pedestrian incident?

Is it your opinion, based on a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, that those injuries are consistent with an animal attack as opposed to a motor vehicular pedestrian incident?

What evidence do they actually have to prove that that SUV ever hit John? The answer is none. They don't have any. There's no evidence whatsoever that Karen Reid's vehicle ever struck John O'Keefe. In fact, every single piece of material evidence in this case unequivocally proves the opposite.

What evidence do they actually have to prove that that SUV ever hit John? The answer is none. They don't have any. There's no evidence whatsoever that Karen Reid's vehicle ever struck John O'Keefe. In fact, every single piece of material evidence in this case unequivocally proves the opposite.